Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

ISO 17664: What Manufacturers Must Tell You About Reprocessing

ISO 17664 sets what reprocessing information a device maker must supply. Scope, editions, a ten-area IFU checklist, and what it does not do.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

General information about a standard, not medical advice and not a processing procedure. Follow the instructions for use supplied with each device.

Short answer

ISO 17664 is the standard that tells a medical device manufacturer what reprocessing information to supply with a reusable device. It does not itself define the cleaning or sterilization steps. The current edition, ISO 17664-1:2021, covers critical and semi-critical devices and replaced the 2017 edition. Your facility follows the device’s instructions for use (IFU), not the standard.

Definition and scope

The 2021 edition is titled Processing of health care products: Information to be provided by the medical device manufacturer for the processing of medical devices, Part 1: Critical and semi-critical medical devices. It was published in July 2021 and runs 23 pages, according to the AFNOR listing of the standard. The scope statement says the document specifies requirements for the information to be provided by the medical device manufacturer, and adds that processing instructions are not defined in this document.

It applies to processing before first use and before reuse. The standard names exclusions: non-critical devices (unless they are intended to be sterilized), textile devices for patient draping or surgical clothing, and single-use devices supplied ready for use. For what critical and semi-critical mean, see the Spaulding classification guide.

How it is used in practice: standard, IFU, facility

Three parties each hold a different piece:

  • The standard sets which information categories a manufacturer must provide.
  • The manufacturer writes device-specific instructions. Health Canada’s guidance says reusable-device manufacturers must include appropriate reprocessing information, that disassembly instructions should carry photos or schematics, and that sterilization instructions should specify the reprocessing method, process temperatures and times, plus drying or aeration times. It also says instructions should account for equipment usually available in a health care facility.
  • The facility (lab, clinic, sterile processing) reads and follows that IFU. The standard is the reason the IFU has a predictable structure; it is not the document staff work from at the bench.

Separately, the US FDA guidance Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling (issued March 2015, docket FDA-2011-D-0293) addresses how reprocessing instructions are validated and how reprocessing labeling is reviewed in premarket submissions. The FDA guidance page does not mention ISO 17664, so the two should not be treated as the same requirement.

Checklist: ten information areas to look for in an IFU

The 2021 edition says the manufacturer’s information must cover these activities. Use them as questions when you review a reusable device’s IFU before buying or onboarding it. If an area is silent, ask the manufacturer.

Area Question to ask of the IFU
Point-of-use treatment Does it say what to do immediately after use?
Pre-cleaning Is there preparation before the main cleaning?
Cleaning Is a cleaning method given for this device?
Disinfection Is disinfection addressed, or stated as not applicable?
Drying Is drying addressed?
Inspection and maintenance Does it say how to check the device and maintain it?
Packaging Is packaging before sterilization addressed?
Sterilization Is a sterilization method given, with parameters?
Storage Is storage addressed?
Transport Is transport addressed?

Parts and editions

Edition Details Source
ISO 17664:2004 Specified information a manufacturer provides on reprocessing devices claimed to be resterilizable. Health Canada’s 2011 guidance says reprocessing information should meet it. Health Canada
ISO 17664:2017 Cancelled and replaced by the 2021 edition. AFNOR listing
ISO 17664-1:2021 Current Part 1 for critical and semi-critical devices; published July 2021. AFNOR listing

The Health Canada guidance (final June 1, 2011) cites the 2004 edition. That reflects its date; this page does not claim Health Canada has since adopted the 2021 text.

Where it matters for labs, clinics and supply decisions

  • Reading a device listing. A reusable device should ship with reprocessing information. Single-use devices supplied ready for use fall outside Part 1. The trade-offs are covered in autoclavable vs single-use surgical instruments.
  • Matching equipment to the IFU. Because the IFU states the method, temperatures and times, check that your equipment is one the IFU names; see the washer-disinfector guide for one such machine.
  • Program context. Facility-side practice is covered in medical device reprocessing and in the ANSI/AAMI ST79 entry, which is a different standard.

Common misunderstandings

  • It is not a cleaning protocol. The scope statement says processing instructions are not defined in it.
  • It does not certify a device. It sets requirements for the information supplied, not for the device’s performance.
  • It does not cover everything. Part 1 excludes non-critical devices unless intended to be sterilized, and the listed single-use and textile exclusions.
  • It is not FDA’s rule. The FDA guidance addresses validation and labeling of reprocessing instructions and does not mention ISO 17664.

FAQ

What is ISO 17664?

A standard on the information a medical device manufacturer must provide for processing a device. The current edition is ISO 17664-1:2021.

Does ISO 17664 tell me how to sterilize instruments?

No. It states that processing instructions are not defined in it; the device IFU supplies them.

Does ISO 17664-1 cover non-critical devices?

No, unless they are intended to be sterilized. Single-use devices supplied ready for use and textile devices for patient draping or surgical clothing are also excluded.

Which edition is current?

ISO 17664-1:2021, published July 2021, replacing ISO 17664:2017 (per the AFNOR listing).

Sources

  • AFNOR Boutique, ISO 17664-1:2021 listing, checked 2026-10-30: boutique.afnor.org
  • Health Canada, guidance on information to be provided by manufacturers for sterilization of reusable medical devices (2011), checked 2026-10-30: canada.ca
  • US FDA, Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling (March 2015; page current as of 2018-06-13), checked 2026-10-30: fda.gov

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about ISO 17664: What Manufacturers Must Tell You About Reprocessing

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →