Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical Supply Distributor100,000+ medical supplies. 48-hour critical dispatch.Ships from 8 regional U.S. hubs. Net-30 terms for verified institutional accounts.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Microcurrent Therapy: What It Is, How It Differs From TENS, and How Devices Are Regulated

Microcurrent therapy delivers subsensory microampere currents, unlike the stronger currents of TENS. See how it is told apart and what the 2025 evidence says.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

General information only, not medical advice. Device selection and use belong with a qualified clinician and the manufacturer’s instructions for use.

Short answer

Microcurrent therapy is a non-invasive electrical modality that delivers subsensory currents, typically in the microampere range, with the aim of supporting tissue repair. A 2025 narrative review contrasts it with TENS, which works in the milliampere range, about 1,000 times higher. The same review says more high-quality evidence is needed.

Definition and scope

Jonik, Rothka and Cherin (2025) describe microcurrent (MIC) therapy as a non-invasive treatment modality that emits subsensory electrical currents, typically delivered in the microampere range. Subsensory means the user is not meant to feel the current. The review covers uses discussed in the literature for chronic pain, wound healing, musculoskeletal injuries and neuropsychological conditions. This page explains the modality and how it is told apart from related devices; it does not describe treatment settings or protocols.

In short, what is microcurrent? A low-intensity electrical current, below the level of sensation, as opposed to the stronger currents used in nerve or muscle stimulation.

How microcurrent differs from TENS and muscle stimulators

The three terms are often mixed up.

Device family What the source says Source
Microcurrent (MIC) Subsensory currents, typically in the microampere range; the review says the low intensity avoids nerve depolarization, muscle contraction, fatigue and pain. Jonik et al., 2025
TENS Currents in the milliampere range, which the review puts at 1,000 times higher than MIC, resulting in nerve depolarization, muscle contraction, fatigue and pain. Jonik et al., 2025
Powered muscle stimulator Defined in 21 CFR 890.5850 as an electrically powered device for medical purposes that repeatedly contracts muscles by passing electrical currents through electrodes contacting the affected body area. Class II. 21 CFR 890.5850

For readers who handle TENS or EMS supplies, see our guides to what a TENS unit is, how a TENS unit works, TENS pads and EMS pads.

Proposed mechanisms

The review lists several mechanisms as proposed rather than established: restored transmembrane potential, calcium influx, ATP synthesis, activation of fibroblasts and satellite cells, and endothelial nitric oxide release with angiogenesis. It states that the exact mode of action is unclear and that microcurrent is presumed to follow the Arndt-Schultz law, in which low currents stimulate and high currents inhibit. A study it cites reported that a 500 μA current increased ATP production by 500% while a 5 mA current inhibited it. That is a laboratory finding about a mechanism, not a statement about outcomes in people.

Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is described in the review as microcurrent applied through earclip electrodes.

What the evidence shows

  • The source is a narrative review, not a systematic review, and its authors write that more high-quality evidence is needed.
  • The review discusses CES and wound care as areas of study and reports that some of its data are inconsistent. This page does not assess whether microcurrent works for any condition.
  • The review notes that small samples, limited controls and varied parameters make it hard to set standard dosing across studies.

Where it matters for labs, clinics and supply decisions

The marketing term “microcurrent” does not decide how a device is regulated. Under 21 CFR 890.5850 a powered muscle stimulator is defined by repeatedly contracting muscles, which the review says microcurrent avoids, so that regulation should not be assumed to cover a microcurrent device. FDA classification runs through the device’s product code and cleared indication. The FDA Product Classification database shows the pattern: product code NUW, “stimulator, muscle, powered, dental”, sits under 890.5850 as Class 2 with the cleared indication “Relief of muscle spasms associated with tmj. Muscle reeducation, increasing blood flow.” A checklist for staff reading a device record:

  1. Find the cleared indication in the FDA record, not the brochure wording.
  2. Note the product code and the regulation number attached to it.
  3. Note the device class listed for that code.
  4. Read the manufacturer’s instructions for use for intended users and settings.

Common misunderstandings

  • Microcurrent is a stronger TENS. The review places it at about one-thousandth of TENS intensity.
  • Microcurrent is a muscle stimulator. The regulation describes muscle stimulators as devices that repeatedly contract muscles; the review says microcurrent avoids muscle contraction.
  • The ATP figures prove clinical benefit. The review presents the mechanisms as proposed and the mode of action as unclear.

FAQ

What is microcurrent?

Microcurrent is a low-intensity, subsensory electrical current, typically in the microampere range, used in a non-invasive therapy modality (Jonik et al., 2025).

How is microcurrent different from TENS?

TENS uses milliampere currents, about 1,000 times higher, which the review links to nerve depolarization and muscle contraction. Microcurrent stays below the level of sensation.

Is microcurrent therapy proven?

The 2025 narrative review is a summary of the literature, not a systematic review. Its authors state that more high-quality evidence is needed, and this page does not judge whether microcurrent works for any condition.

Sources

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Microcurrent Therapy: What It Is, How It Differs From TENS, and How Devices Are Regulated

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →