Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical Supply Distributor100,000+ medical supplies. 48-hour critical dispatch.Ships from 8 regional U.S. hubs. Net-30 terms for verified institutional accounts.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

National Lung Screening Trial (NLST): Design, Results and Data Access

NLST design, eligibility and results (17.6 vs 20.7 lung cancer deaths per 1,000) plus how researchers request the data through NCI CDAS.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

General information about a published research trial, not medical advice. Decisions about lung cancer screening belong to individuals and their clinicians.

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was a US randomized trial that compared annual low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) with standard chest X-ray in heavy smokers. This page is for researchers, students and research administrators who need the design at a glance, the headline results in both relative and absolute terms, and the route to the trial’s data through the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Facts below come from the official NCI pages, checked 2026-11-07.

What the NLST is and who ran it

NCI describes the NLST as a randomized trial of two screening tests for lung cancer: low-dose helical CT and standard chest X-ray. It was conducted by two groups, ACRIN (the American College of Radiology Imaging Network) and the Lung Screening Study group, and launched in 2002. Initial findings were announced in November 2010 and the primary results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 29, 2011. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00028808. It is a randomized design: participants were randomly assigned to one screening method or the other.

Eligibility

As the NCI NLST page states, the trial enrolled 53,454 current or former heavy smokers who met all of the following:

  • age 55 to 74;
  • a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years;
  • no signs, symptoms or history of lung cancer at entry.

These are the trial’s own entry criteria. They are not a statement of who should be screened today; current screening recommendations are issued separately by bodies such as the US Preventive Services Task Force.

What the trial required: design at a glance

Element As described by NCI
Participants 53,454 heavy current or former smokers
Comparison Low-dose helical CT versus standard chest X-ray, by random assignment
Screening schedule Three annual screens
Follow-up About 7 years
Registry record ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00028808

Results: relative and absolute figures side by side

NCI reports that participants screened with low-dose helical CT had 15 to 20 percent fewer deaths from lung cancer than those screened with chest X-ray. The same page gives the absolute rates, which put that relative figure in scale:

Measure CT arm Chest X-ray arm
Lung cancer deaths per 1,000 participants 17.6 20.7
Positive screens, averaged over the three rounds 24.2% 6.9%

The difference between 20.7 and 17.6 is about 3 fewer lung cancer deaths per 1,000 people screened. The higher share of positive CT screens matters for analyses of follow-up testing, not only mortality.

How researchers access NLST data

NCI’s Cancer Data Access System (CDAS) distributes NLST data. The CDAS NLST page sets out these steps:

  1. Choose a project type. CDAS lists three: Data-Only; Images (images plus data); and EEMS (biospecimens, through the PLCO Etiologic and Early Marker Studies Program).
  2. Submit a project proposal through CDAS.
  3. NCI reviews the proposal.
  4. Sign the agreements if approved: a Data Transfer and Use Agreement and, for biospecimens, a Material Transfer Agreement.

The full dataset described by CDAS covers demographics, screening results, diagnostic procedures, lung cancer outcomes and mortality, including CT and pathology images. Data dictionaries are on the NLST Datasets page. For how such records are classed, see clinical trial data.

Routes that do not go through CDAS

  • Some CT and pathology images, with a limited set of clinical variables, are available through NCI Imaging Data Commons and The Cancer Imaging Archive, without a CDAS proposal.
  • X-ray images, ACRIN-only data and ACRIN biospecimens are requested from ECOG-ACRIN using its Contact Us form with the subject “Data Sharing”; CDAS states a response within 48 working hours.

Typical phases

Using only the phases NCI describes: launch in 2002; enrollment and three annual screening rounds; follow-up of about 7 years; initial findings (November 2010); peer-reviewed primary results (June 2011); then secondary use of the data by outside investigators through CDAS and the image archives. For a new data request, treat proposal preparation, NCI review and agreement signing as separate stages.

Common mistakes

  • Quoting only the relative reduction. “15 to 20 percent” is accurate but should sit beside 17.6 versus 20.7 deaths per 1,000.
  • Treating the trial’s eligibility as current screening guidance. The criteria describe who enrolled in the trial, not today’s recommendations.
  • Assuming all NLST data comes from CDAS. X-ray images and ACRIN-only data and biospecimens go through ECOG-ACRIN, and some images are open via Imaging Data Commons and The Cancer Imaging Archive.
  • Overlooking the positive-screen rate. 24.2% of CT screens were positive versus 6.9% for X-ray, averaged over three rounds.
  • Skipping the agreement. Proposal approval is followed by signing the Data Transfer and Use Agreement.

Related programs and data sources

Resource What the CDAS page says it provides
NCI Cancer Data Access System (CDAS) Full NLST dataset with images, by proposal, review and Data Transfer and Use Agreement
NCI Imaging Data Commons Some CT and pathology images with limited clinical variables, no CDAS proposal
The Cancer Imaging Archive Some CT and pathology images with limited clinical variables, no CDAS proposal
ECOG-ACRIN (Data Sharing form) X-ray images, ACRIN-only data, ACRIN biospecimens

For background, see CASRAI’s guides to medical imaging and epidemiology, and the dictionary entries for the clinical trial protocol and informed consent form.

FAQ

What was the National Lung Screening Trial?

A randomized trial of 53,454 heavy smokers aged 55 to 74 comparing annual low-dose helical CT with chest X-ray for three rounds, launched in 2002.

What did it find?

15 to 20 percent lower lung cancer mortality with CT: 17.6 versus 20.7 deaths per 1,000, about 3 fewer per 1,000 screened.

Who could enroll?

Current or former heavy smokers aged 55 to 74 with at least 30 pack-years and no signs, symptoms or history of lung cancer.

How do I get NLST data?

Submit a project proposal in NCI CDAS, pass NCI review and sign the Data Transfer and Use Agreement; some images are available without CDAS from Imaging Data Commons and The Cancer Imaging Archive.

Sources

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about National Lung Screening Trial (NLST): Design, Results and Data Access

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →