Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Pivot-RP: How to Use the Funding Opportunity Database

How to access, search, and set up alerts in Clarivate’s Pivot-RP funding database, and how it compares functionally to Grants.gov.

Pivot-RP (formerly COS Pivot, now published by Clarivate on the ProQuest platform) is one of the most widely licensed funding-discovery databases in US and international research administration, but most researchers encounter it only through an institutional link with no orientation to what it actually does. This guide walks through what Pivot-RP is, how access works, how to search it effectively, and how it differs functionally from Grants.gov — the free federal alternative covered in CASRAI’s broader funding opportunity databases landscape guide.

What Is Pivot-RP?

Pivot-RP is a subscription funding-intelligence platform, currently owned and operated by Clarivate (the company behind Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports), that combines three layers of data in a single interface:

  • Funding opportunities. Clarivate describes Pivot-RP as an “expert-curated source of global research funding opportunities,” editorially reviewed daily by a Clarivate editorial team rather than aggregated purely by automated scraping. Coverage spans US federal agencies, private foundations, corporate sponsors, and non-US/international funders in one searchable index — broader sponsor-type coverage than a single-agency portal like Grants.gov.
  • Funder and past-award data. Pivot-RP also surfaces information on funders themselves and on grants they have previously awarded, letting a researcher see a sponsor’s funding history and typical award patterns alongside its open calls, rather than searching open opportunities and past-award history in two separate systems.
  • Researcher profiles. Pivot-RP integrates scholarly-profile data (tied to Web of Science) so users can search for potential collaborators, co-investigators, or reviewers by expertise, not just search for money. This is the basis of the platform’s Profile Discovery feature, covered below.

Exact sponsor and opportunity counts fluctuate as the database is updated continuously and Clarivate does not commit to a fixed figure long-term; treat any specific number as approximate and current only as of when it was checked, not as a stable statistic to cite indefinitely.

How Institutions and Researchers Get Access

Pivot-RP is licensed on an institutional subscription model — it is not something an individual researcher purchases directly. A university, research institute, hospital system, or similar organization licenses access on behalf of its research community, typically through one of two channels:

  • The institution’s library, where Pivot-RP is listed among licensed research databases (often alongside Web of Science and other Clarivate products), or
  • The office of sponsored programs / vice president for research (VPR) office, which frequently maintains a dedicated portal page pointing researchers to Pivot-RP as part of its grant-development support services.

Where an institutional subscription is active, most users reach Pivot-RP by clicking through from that institutional access point (single sign-on or IP-authenticated access is common), then completing a one-time individual profile registration on pivot.proquest.com tied to their institutional email address. Access without an active institutional subscription is not generally available — if your institution does not subscribe, check with your library or sponsored-programs office before assuming Pivot-RP is available to you, and see the FAQ below for what to do if it isn’t.

Setting Up Your Pivot-RP Profile

Once inside the platform via institutional access, new users create an individual profile. This is not just an account — the profile is what powers personalized funding recommendations and the researcher-discovery layer described above. Building it out with genuine detail (research interests, discipline keywords, prior funding history, publications) is the single highest-leverage first step, because Pivot-RP’s matching and recommendation features are only as good as the profile behind them. Clarivate’s own product materials describe this as the intended “first step” workflow: create the profile, then move to discovering opportunities, rather than searching cold.

Institutions with active subscriptions, and Clarivate itself, typically provide short e-learning modules and recorded webinars (commonly in the 15–20 minute range) covering profile setup, funding search, and administrative features in more exact interface detail than is practical to reproduce here, since Pivot-RP’s interface changes over time; check your institution’s library guide or sponsored-programs office for the current version of these materials, or Clarivate/ProQuest’s own Pivot-RP training resources.

Searching for Funding Opportunities

Pivot-RP’s core search lets users query the funding-opportunity index by keyword, sponsor, sponsor type (federal, foundation, corporate, non-US), deadline window, funding amount, career stage, and discipline/subject area, among other filters — the exact filter set and layout vary by platform version. Clarivate has added AI-assisted search capability to the product, including natural-language (“semantic”) search and an AI “Funding Advisor” that recommends opportunities based on a user’s profile rather than requiring the user to construct a precise keyword query. In practice this means a new user has two reasonable starting points:

  1. Profile-driven recommendations — let the platform surface opportunities matched to the profile built during onboarding, useful as a first pass to see what’s out there before refining.
  2. Direct search — construct a keyword and filter query for a specific known need (e.g., a particular sponsor, career stage, or deadline range), useful once you know roughly what you’re looking for.

Because Pivot-RP’s opportunity records are editorially reviewed rather than purely auto-scraped, eligibility criteria and deadlines are generally kept current on active listings — a meaningful difference from lower-curation aggregators, though it does not eliminate the need to verify final deadline and eligibility details directly against the sponsor’s own posting before submitting anything.

Profile Discovery: Finding Collaborators

Separate from opportunity search, Pivot-RP’s Profile Discovery tool lets users search researcher profiles — at their own institution and beyond — by expertise, discipline, and publication or award history. This is aimed at building multi-investigator teams, identifying potential external collaborators for a multi-site proposal, or locating subject-matter reviewers, and it draws on the same Web of Science-linked profile data described above. For research development offices specifically tasked with team-building on large proposals, this is often a distinct workflow from opportunity search rather than an afterthought; CASRAI’s guide to the research development manager role covers this collaborator-matching work in more institutional depth.

Saved Searches, Alerts, and Curated Lists

Pivot-RP supports several mechanisms for tracking opportunities over time rather than re-searching from scratch:

  • Saved searches, which persist a query so a researcher (or an administrator setting one up on a researcher’s behalf) can re-run or automatically re-check it as new opportunities are added.
  • Curated and shared lists that a sponsored-programs office or research development team can assemble around a strategic priority (a particular institute-wide initiative, a discipline, an early-career cohort) and share out to relevant faculty.
  • Automated newsletters, which Clarivate’s own product description lists as an administrative feature — letting an office push a curated, branded digest of matched opportunities to its research community on a recurring schedule rather than relying on individual researchers to check the platform themselves.
  • Groups, a feature for creating and managing shared user groups so opportunities and deadlines can be communicated to a defined community with similar interests (e.g., a department, an institute, or a cross-institutional network).

Together, these features are what distinguish Pivot-RP from a plain search tool for an office that needs to actively manage funding awareness across dozens or hundreds of faculty, rather than a single individual periodically checking for new calls.

Pivot-RP vs. Grants.gov: Key Differences

Grants.gov and Pivot-RP are frequently mentioned together, but they serve different scopes and are not really substitutes for one another:

Dimension Pivot-RP Grants.gov
Access model Institutional subscription (Clarivate/ProQuest license) Free and open to anyone; no subscription
Sponsor coverage US federal agencies, foundations, corporate sponsors, and non-US/international funders in one index US federal grant-making agencies only
Researcher-profile / past-funding layer Built in (Web of Science-linked profiles, past-award history, collaborator discovery) Not present — Grants.gov is an opportunity-posting and application-submission portal, not a researcher database
Curation Editorially reviewed by Clarivate staff Posted directly by federal agencies
Primary use case Discovering and tracking opportunities across many sponsor types, plus finding collaborators Discovering and applying to federal opportunities specifically; the required system of record for federal proposal submission

In practice, many institutions use both: Pivot-RP for the broader discovery layer across foundation, corporate, and international funding plus collaborator search, and Grants.gov for the specific mechanics of finding and submitting to federal opportunities (which, per CASRAI’s funding opportunity databases guide, is free to search and only requires SAM.gov/UEI registration at the point of actually applying, not for browsing). Pivot-RP does not replace the federal submission process — a federal opportunity discovered in Pivot-RP is still ultimately applied for through Grants.gov, Research.gov, ASSIST, or the relevant agency’s own portal.

Practical Workflow: First-Time User Checklist

  1. Confirm your institution has an active Pivot-RP subscription (check your library’s database list or your sponsored-programs office).
  2. Access the platform through your institution’s authenticated link, then complete individual profile registration at pivot.proquest.com.
  3. Build out your profile with genuine research-interest keywords, discipline, career stage, and prior funding/publication history — this drives both opportunity recommendations and how discoverable you are to others via Profile Discovery.
  4. Run an initial search (or review profile-matched recommendations) to get a sense of the current opportunity landscape in your area.
  5. Set up one or more saved searches for recurring needs (e.g., “early-career, [discipline], deadline in next 6 months”) so new matches surface automatically rather than requiring a manual re-search.
  6. If you’re a research development or sponsored-programs staff member managing this for a department or institute, consider curated lists, groups, and an automated newsletter to push relevant opportunities out on a schedule rather than relying on individual faculty checking the platform.
  7. Use Profile Discovery separately when you specifically need to identify collaborators, co-investigators, or potential reviewers rather than funding opportunities themselves.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pivot-RP free?

No. Pivot-RP is a paid, institutionally licensed subscription product from Clarivate/ProQuest. Individuals cannot subscribe on their own; access depends on your institution (or another organization, such as a hospital research office) holding an active license. Grants.gov, by contrast, is free and open to search without any subscription.

How do I get access to Pivot-RP?

Check whether your institution already subscribes — typically via your library’s database list or your office of sponsored programs / VPR office, which often links directly to Pivot-RP as part of grant-development support. If your institution doesn’t currently subscribe, that office (rather than Clarivate directly) is generally the right first contact, since they would evaluate and negotiate any new institutional license.

What’s the difference between Pivot-RP and Grants.gov?

Grants.gov is a free, US-federal-government-only portal for finding and submitting to federal funding opportunities. Pivot-RP is a paid, institutionally subscribed database with broader sponsor coverage (federal, foundation, corporate, and international funders), plus a built-in researcher-profile and collaborator-discovery layer that Grants.gov does not have. They’re commonly used together rather than as alternatives to one another — see the comparison table above.

What is the Profile Discovery tool used for?

It searches researcher profiles — drawing on Web of Science-linked data — to help identify potential collaborators, co-investigators, or reviewers by expertise, publication history, and past awards, separately from searching for funding opportunities themselves.

Can I set up automatic alerts for new funding opportunities?

Yes. Pivot-RP supports saved searches that persist a query over time, and administrative users can configure automated, branded newsletters that push curated opportunity lists to a research community on a recurring schedule.

Related CASRAI Resources

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →