Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Physical Therapy (PT) Intake Form: APTA ICF Structure, Red Flag Screening, PROMs, and HL7 FHIR Workflows

Clinical documentation and health informatics guide to the Physical Therapy (PT) intake and medical history form, covering APTA/WHO ICF domains, red flag screening, validated functional outcome scales (ODI, LEFS, FOTO), and HL7 FHIR Questionnaire structuring.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

A Physical Therapy (PT) intake form—also referred to as a physical therapy medical history and physical form—is a structured pre-evaluation questionnaire completed by an outpatient, orthopedic, neurologic, or pelvic-health rehabilitation patient prior to the initial physical therapist examination. Aligned with the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Guide to Physical Therapist Practice and the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), a comprehensive PT intake form captures medical history, systemic red flags, baseline functional disability scores, and environmental context to support clinical differential screening and CMS-compliant Plan of Care documentation.

What Should Be Included in a PT Intake Form? Core Clinical & ICF Domains

Unlike a general medical clinic intake, a physical therapy medical history form must evaluate both medical appropriateness for physical rehabilitation (ruling out non-musculoskeletal pathology requiring urgent physician referral, particularly in Direct Access states) and quantifiable functional limitations across the WHO ICF framework:

PT Intake Section WHO ICF / Regulatory Mapping Required Discrete Data Elements
1. Chief Complaint & Mechanism of Injury Health Condition / Disorder Anatomical region, symptom onset date (acute vs. chronic), mechanism of injury (trauma, post-surgical date, insidious onset), and worker’s comp / auto liability status
2. Pain Profile & Body Diagram ICF Body Functions (b280 Sensation of pain) 0–10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at current, best, and worst levels over 24 hours; pain quality (sharp, aching, radicular, burning); aggravating and easing postures
3. Medical History & Systemic Red Flag Screen Differential Screening & Review of Systems Unexplained weight loss, night pain unrelieved by position change, fever/chills, saddle anesthesia, bowel/bladder incontinence (cauda equina screen), history of cancer, osteoporosis, DVT, or fracture
4. Comorbidities, Implants & Medications Modality Contraindications & Safety Cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator (contraindication to diathermy/TENS), pregnancy, diabetes, hypertension, anticoagulants, corticosteroids, and opioid/analgesic regimen
5. Prior Level of Function (PLOF) & Home Context ICF Activities, Participation & Environmental Factors Pre-injury mobility baseline, number of home entry/interior stairs, assistive devices (cane, walker, orthosis), caregiver support, and occupational lifting/standing demands
6. Region-Specific Functional Outcome Scale (PROM) CMS Medicare Benefit Policy Manual Ch. 15 § 220.3 & MIPS Baseline validated score (e.g., ODI, NDI, LEFS, QuickDASH, KOOS/HOOS, or FOTO CAT) plus patient-stated functional goals

Standardized Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Embedded in PT Intake

Under the CMS Medicare Benefit Policy Manual (Chapter 15, § 220.3) and Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) physical therapy quality measures, outpatient rehabilitation documentation must establish an objective, quantifiable baseline of functional limitation at initial evaluation and re-measure progress at periodic re-evaluations and discharge. Modern digital PT intake forms—as well as virtual MSK platforms such as Hinge Health and Omada Health—automatically assign a validated region-specific PROM based on the body region selected by the patient:

  • Lumbar Spine: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (10 sections scored 0–5, expressed as a 0%–100% disability percentage; LOINC 72100-1) or the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
  • Cervical Spine: Neck Disability Index (NDI) (10 items scored 0–50 points or 0%–100%).
  • Lower Extremity (Hip, Knee, Ankle, Foot): Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) (20 items scored 0–4 for a maximum score of 80 points, where lower scores indicate greater disability; Minimum Clinically Important Difference [MCID] = 9 scale points), alongside joint-specific instruments such as KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and HOOS.
  • Upper Extremity (Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Hand): DASH or QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, scaled 0–100).
  • Psychosocial Yellow Flag Screening: For chronic musculoskeletal pain cohorts, intake packets frequently pair physical scales with the OSPRO-YF (Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag) tool, the STarT Back Screening Tool, or elements from a biopsychosocial assessment template to identify fear-avoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing.
  • Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes (FOTO): Item-response theory (IRT) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) questionnaires that dynamically select subsequent functional questions based on the patient’s prior response to yield risk-adjusted predicted outcome trajectories.

How Is a PT Intake Form Structured in EHR Workflows?

In hospital outpatient rehabilitation departments, private physical therapy practices, and pragmatic musculoskeletal clinical trials, the PT intake form is integrated into electronic medical charting through HL7 FHIR and LOINC standards:

  1. HL7 FHIR R4 Questionnaire and Conditional Branching (enableWhen): Digital intake portals define the PT intake packet as a FHIR Questionnaire resource. Using FHIR’s native enableWhen conditional logic, selecting “Low Back” on the anatomical body map dynamically renders the 10-item Oswestry Disability Index and cauda equina red-flag questions while hiding shoulder-specific QuickDASH items.
  2. Automated Scoring via HL7 FHIR Structured Data Capture (SDC): When the patient submits the form on a smartphone or clinic tablet, the resulting QuestionnaireResponse executes FHIR SDC calculation expressions to compute the composite PROM score (e.g., LEFS = 42/80) and writes discrete Observation resources bound to LOINC and SNOMED CT codes directly into the Initial Evaluation note for therapist review and physical examination correlation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should be included in a PT intake form?

A physical therapy (PT) intake form should include patient demographics and referral/direct-access details, chief complaint and mechanism of injury, a 0–10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and body diagram, past medical and surgical history, systemic Red Flag screening (such as cauda equina symptoms, unexplained weight loss, night pain, or fracture risk), modality contraindications (such as pacemakers or pregnancy), prior level of function and home/work environment under the WHO ICF framework, and a validated region-specific functional outcome measure (such as the Oswestry Disability Index, LEFS, NDI, QuickDASH, or FOTO).

How is a PT intake form structured in EHR workflows?

In modern rehabilitation EHRs, a PT intake form is modeled as an HL7 FHIR R4 Questionnaire resource with conditional branching (enableWhen) that triggers the appropriate LOINC-coded functional outcome questionnaire (such as ODI or LEFS) based on the patient’s injured body region. Upon submission, the QuestionnaireResponse automatically calculates baseline functional scores and populates discrete problem history, red-flag alerts, and CMS Plan of Care fields for therapist attestation.

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Physical Therapy (PT) Intake Form: APTA ICF Structure, Red Flag Screening, PROMs, and HL7 FHIR Workflows

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →