Skip to main content
v2026.11,986 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Silvercel Silver Alginate Dressing: FDA Clearances and Label Facts

Silvercel silver alginate dressing explained: composition, the two FDA 510(k) clearances, catalog-number cross-walk and label cautions.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Published · Last updated

On this page

General product information, not medical advice. Dressing choice and use belong to the treating clinician and the manufacturer’s instructions for use.

Short answer

Silvercel is a brand name for sterile silver alginate wound dressings. The product is a non-woven pad of alginate, carboxymethylcellulose and silver-coated nylon fibres. Its non-adherent version adds a perforated contact layer. FDA records show two 510(k) clearances under the name, K024298 and K081363, both under product code FRO.

Definition and scope

Silvercel is a trade name, not a generic category. The 510(k) summary for K081363 (decision 24 September 2008, Substantially Equivalent) names the device “SILVERCEL Non-Adherent Antimicrobial Alginate Dressing”, submitted by Advanced Medical Solutions Limited of Winsford, Cheshire, UK, with a footnote that the name is a trademark of Johnson & Johnson. In openFDA’s UDI database the labelers listed are Advanced Medical Solutions Limited and 3M Deutschland GmbH, so the brand has carried different company names over time.

It belongs to the wider family covered in What Is a Medical Dressing?. For other named silver or alginate products see Silverlon, Maxorb and Melgisorb.

How it is described in the FDA record

The K081363 summary describes a “sterile, non woven pad composed of a high G (guluronic acid) alginate, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and silver coated nylon fibres, laminated to a perforated, non-adherent ethylene methyl acrylate (EMA) wound contact layer”. The stated functions are absorbing exudate, intact removal and keeping a moist wound environment. The indication reads that the dressing is an effective barrier to bacterial penetration, and that this barrier “may help reduce infection” in moderate to heavily exuding partial and full-thickness wounds, including pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, donor sites, traumatic and surgical wounds. It is “indicated for external use only”.

Composition and the non-adherent layer

Component (per K081363) What the summary calls it
High-G alginate Alginate with a high guluronic acid content, part of the absorbent pad
Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) Pad component alongside the alginate
Silver-coated nylon fibres The silver-containing element of the pad
Perforated EMA layer Ethylene methyl acrylate wound contact layer, the only change in the 2008 modification

The summary says the modification was “the addition of a perforated, non-adherent wound contact layer”. For a general explanation of that feature see What Is a Non-Adherent Dressing?.

Silvercel versus Silvercel Non-Adherent

This is the point most listings blur. FDA and UDI records separate two versions.

Item Plain Silvercel Silvercel Non-Adherent
510(k) in UDI records K024298 K081363 (predicate K024298)
Catalog numbers in UDI records 800112, 800202, 800404, 800408 900112, 900202, 900404, 900408
Contact layer Not part of the K081363 modification Perforated EMA layer added

The catalog-number split (800xxx plain, 900xxx non-adherent) comes from openFDA UDI records read on 8 November 2026 for the listed 3M Deutschland GmbH and Advanced Medical Solutions entries. Catalog numbers alone are not unique: the same digits (800112 and 900112 included) are also used by unrelated products from other manufacturers, and 800112 appears in the records read only under the 3M Deutschland GmbH entry, so match on brand, description and 510(k) number together. openFDA states its data is unvalidated and not for medical decisions, so use it for identification only and confirm against the product label.

FDA product code FRO

K081363 lists the classification name “Dressing, Wound, Drug”, product code FRO, and a classification of “Unclassified”. UDI records show device class “U”, single use and sterile. Both Silvercel clearances are 510(k)s; the summary lists the classification as unclassified rather than Class I, II or III.

Label cautions to check

A product profile published by Wounds UK (manufacturer profile) lists the following, which are worth checking against the current label for any specific pack:

  • Not indicated where there is known sensitivity to alginates, ethylene methyl acrylate or silver.
  • Not indicated for surgical implantation, or for pregnant or lactating women.
  • Not intended to control heavy bleeding.
  • Very limited data exists on prolonged and repeated use of silver-containing dressings, particularly in children and neonates.
  • Suitable for use under medical supervision, including in infected wounds or wounds at increased risk of infection.
  • Non-adherent UDI records show MRI safety status “MR Unsafe”; some older records state that the labeling has no MRI safety information.

The same profile cites a manufacturer-referenced claim of sustained silver ion release for up to 7 days; that is a manufacturer claim, not an FDA finding.

Where it matters for labs, clinics and supply decisions

For supply staff, the useful discipline is identification: a purchasing or protocol record that says only “Silvercel” does not show which clearance, catalog number or labeler applies. Recording the 510(k) number and catalog number resolves that. Comparisons of how silver and plain alginate differ in general terms are in calcium alginate vs silver alginate and Aquacel Ag vs calcium alginate.

Common misunderstandings

  • “Silvercel is one product.” The records show at least two versions under separate clearances.
  • “The brand owner is fixed.” The 510(k) names Advanced Medical Solutions as submitter with a Johnson & Johnson trademark footnote, while UDI records list 3M Deutschland GmbH as a labeler.
  • “Cleared means proven to prevent infection.” The indication is a barrier to bacterial penetration that “may help reduce infection”; it is not a guarantee.

FAQ

What is Silvercel?

A brand of sterile silver alginate wound dressing, made from high-G alginate, CMC and silver-coated nylon fibres, cleared by FDA through 510(k).

What is the difference between Silvercel and Silvercel Non-Adherent?

The non-adherent version (K081363) adds a perforated EMA wound contact layer to the earlier dressing (K024298).

Is Silvercel for external use only?

Yes. The K081363 summary states it is indicated for external use only.

Is Silvercel MRI safe?

UDI records for the non-adherent dressing list it as MR Unsafe; check the label of the specific product.

Sources

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Silvercel Silver Alginate Dressing: FDA Clearances and Label Facts

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →