Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us
GuideLaboratory Operations

Also relevant to: Electronics & Semiconductor Industry

Wafer-Level Packaging: Fan-In vs Fan-Out and WLCSP Assembly

What wafer-level packaging is, how fan-in and fan-out differ, TI’s published WLCSP board-assembly limits, and the named causes of fan-out warpage.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Short answer: Wafer-level packaging (WLP) is a family of integrated-circuit packaging methods in which the package is built while the dies are still part of the wafer, rather than after each die is cut out and mounted individually. In the simplest form, a wafer-level chip-scale package (WLCSP), the package is finished when the wafer is singulated. Fan-out variants add redistribution layers that extend beyond the die edge.

What wafer-level packaging is

A review in Frontiers in Electronics (2024) describes WLP as packaging integrated circuits and other components while they are still on the wafer, and notes that processing whole wafers lowers manufacturing cost and improves yield. Texas Instruments’ application note AN-1112 (rev. December 2019) puts the same idea for its DSBGA product: the package is “completely processed in wafer form; and when singulated, the package is complete.” The package outline matches the die outline, there is no interposer between the IC and the printed circuit board (PCB), and the footprint per I/O is the smallest of the package types TI describes.

For a lab or prototyping group this matters mostly at the bench: a die-sized package has no leads and no substrate, so board design and assembly settings are less forgiving than for a conventional leaded package.

Fan-in versus fan-out

Feature Fan-in WLP Fan-out WLP
Redistribution layers (RDLs) Stay within the die footprint Extend beyond the size of the die, together with the solder balls
I/O capacity Modest; described as an option for low-end mobile devices More I/O while keeping a thin profile
Construction Processed on the original wafer, then singulated Dies are placed on a carrier wafer, molded, then singulated, with RDLs built on the exposed dies

Source: Frontiers in Electronics 2024 warpage review, read 2026-11-08. The same review links application areas to variants: core fan-out mainly to automotive and network uses, high-density fan-out mostly to mobile and antenna-in-package, and ultra-high-density fan-out to network and server uses, with demand driven by autonomous driving, AI, consumer electronics, networking infrastructure, high-performance computing and IoT.

Terminology differences

Sources do not use the terms identically. The Frontiers review treats WLCSP as the fan-in type, while vendors use “WLCSP”, “wafer-level chip-scale package” and “DSBGA” (TI’s name) for die-sized packages, and Amkor’s WLP page groups chip-scale, fan-out, 3D and system-in-package schemes under one heading. When you compare datasheets, check which structure is actually meant before comparing specifications.

How a WLCSP is made

TI’s note lists the sequence for its DSBGA parts: standard wafer fabrication, re-passivation, solder bumps on the I/O pads, backgrinding, a protective encapsulation coating, wafer-sort test, laser marking, singulation, and tape and reel. The parts are then assembled with standard surface-mount technology (SMT).

Assembling a WLCSP on a board: TI’s published guidance

The following checklist restates what TI AN-1112 says for its own DSBGA devices. It is manufacturer guidance for those parts, not an industry-wide rule, so follow the datasheet of the part you actually use.

Item What AN-1112 states
Pad definition Non-solder-mask-defined (NSMD) pads preferred over solder-mask-defined
Copper and traces Copper under 1 oz; trace width no more than two-thirds of the pad diameter
Surface finish OSP or ENIG (gold under 0.2 micron); HASL not recommended
Paste and stencil Type 3 paste or finer; laser-cut, electropolished stencils
Reflow Qualified for up to three reflows at 260 °C peak per J-STD-020
Placement force About 1 kg for 0.5 s maximum
Moisture sensitivity All DSBGA parts are MSL level 1 (unlimited floor life at 30 °C or below and 60% RH)
Underfill Designed for board-level thermal-cycling reliability without underfill in the intended applications; if used, fillet partway up the die edges, CTE close to solder, Tg above the maximum exposure temperature

TI also lists standard bump arrays from 2×2 to 11×11, package heights of 0.35 to 0.55 mm, pitches of 0.3, 0.35, 0.4 and 0.5 mm, and a maximum thickness of 0.3 mm for its PowerWCSP variant. Write these numbers into your assembly procedure only after checking them against the part’s current datasheet; see how to write a lab SOP and the SOP dictionary entry for structuring that document, and facility qualification for qualifying the equipment, such as a reflow oven, that the process depends on.

Warpage in fan-out packaging

The Frontiers review defines warpage as an out-of-plane deformation that disrupts handling, alignment and RDL patterning. It names these causes: thermal-expansion mismatch in the die, mold and carrier stack; changes in molding-compound properties; stress released at debonding; thermal stress during reflow; mechanical stress from backgrinding; and the stiffness and expansion mismatch between copper traces and polyimide in the RDL. Because several causes act together, warpage is managed as a process-wide problem rather than fixed at one step.

Common misunderstandings

  • “Wafer-level” does not mean every step happens on the wafer. Singulation, and for fan-out the reconstitution onto a carrier wafer, change the picture; the sources describe both.
  • Wafer-level does not automatically mean fan-in. Fan-out WLP is also wafer-level, with RDLs reaching beyond the die edge.
  • Assembly numbers are not universal. The pad, finish and reflow limits above are TI’s for DSBGA parts.
  • Calibration of the tools still applies. Placement and reflow settings are only meaningful if the equipment is controlled; see what is calibration.

FAQ

What is the difference between WLP and WLCSP?

WLP is the broad category; WLCSP is the die-sized, fan-in form in which the package is complete when the wafer is cut, as TI and the Frontiers review describe it.

Does a WLCSP need underfill?

TI says its DSBGA parts are designed for board-level thermal-cycling reliability without underfill in the intended applications, and gives selection criteria if underfill is used. Other vendors’ parts may differ.

Why does fan-out WLP warp?

Mainly thermal-expansion mismatch across the die, mold compound and carrier, plus stresses from debonding, reflow and backgrinding, per the Frontiers review.

Sources

  • “Warpage in wafer-level packaging: a review of causes, modelling, and mitigation strategies,” Frontiers in Electronics, 2024, doi 10.3389/felec.2024.1515860 (read 2026-11-08).
  • Texas Instruments, AN-1112 “DSBGA Wafer Level Chip Scale Package,” SNVA009AI, revised December 2019 (read 2026-11-08).
  • Amkor Technology, wafer-level packaging overview page (read 2026-11-08).

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Wafer-Level Packaging: Fan-In vs Fan-Out and WLCSP Assembly

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →