Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: Scoring & Licensing

A comprehensive guide to the WOMAC index: 24 items across 3 subscales, Likert and VAS scoring formulas, MCID thresholds, and proprietary licensing rules.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Medical Disclaimer: This guide provides technical information for researchers and clinical staff. It does not provide medical advice or treatment recommendations.

Short Answer

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a 24-item patient-reported outcome measure evaluating pain, stiffness, and physical disability in hip or knee osteoarthritis. Validated by Nicholas Bellamy and colleagues in 1988, it uses a 5-point Likert scale (0–96 total) or 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale. WOMAC is proprietary intellectual property requiring formal licensing prior to clinical or research administration.

Definition and Scope

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a standardized health status instrument developed by Dr. Nicholas Bellamy and collaborators (1988) at the University of Western Ontario and McMaster University. Designed for osteoarthritis clinical trials, it provides an evaluative measure sensitive to medical and surgical interventions.

What is the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)?

In clinical trials governed by Good Clinical Practice, patient-reported outcome measures serve as essential evaluative endpoints. WOMAC isolates lower-extremity symptoms and functional limitations rather than general quality of life. Translated into more than 110 languages, WOMAC is recognized by global regulatory authorities as an established primary and secondary efficacy endpoint in osteoarthritis cohorts.

How It Works and How It Is Used in Practice

WOMAC captures patient-reported joint impairment through a structured 24-item self-administered questionnaire divided into three core dimensions.

WOMAC Questionnaire Items and Structure

The instrument covers three subscales reflecting daily joint function:

  • Pain (5 items): Walking, using stairs, in bed at night, sitting or lying, and standing upright.
  • Stiffness (2 items): Morning stiffness upon waking, and stiffness after sitting or resting later in the day.
  • Physical Function (17 items): Stairs, rising from sitting, standing, bending, walking, car transfers, shopping, dressing, rising from bed, bathing, sitting, toilet transfers, and domestic duties.

How is the WOMAC Questionnaire Scored?

WOMAC is scored using either an ordinal 5-point Likert scale (WOMAC LK) or a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (WOMAC VA):

  • Likert Scale (0–4 per item): 0 (None) to 4 (Extreme). Subscales: Pain 0–20, Stiffness 0–8, Physical Function 0–68. Total score: 0 to 96 points. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and impairment.
  • Visual Analogue Scale (0–100 mm per item): Subscales: Pain 0–500 mm, Stiffness 0–200 mm, Function 0–1,700 mm (total 0–2,400 mm).
  • Normalized 0–100 Scale: Protocols frequently calculate Normalized Score = (Raw Score / Maximum Subscale Score) × 100, where 0 represents no impairment and 100 represents maximum disability.
  • Missing Data Rules: Under CONSORT-PRO and SPIRIT-PRO standards, mean item substitution is allowed if missing items do not exceed 1 in Pain, 1 in Stiffness, and 3 in Function. Otherwise, the subscale is invalid.

What is the MCID for WOMAC?

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)—or Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII)—identifies the threshold at which score reductions reflect perceptible clinical benefit:

  • Empirical MCII Benchmarks: In a prospective cohort of 1,362 osteoarthritis patients (Tubach et al., 2005, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases), patient-anchored MCII thresholds on a 0–100 normalized scale were -9.1 points (-26.0%) for knee osteoarthritis and -7.9 points (-21.1%) for hip osteoarthritis. Pain VAS MCII was -19.9 mm (-40.8%) for knee and -15.3 mm (-32.0%) for hip.
  • Intervention Context: In conservative therapy, a 10% to 15% reduction (8–12 normalized points) represents a clinically meaningful difference (Angst et al., 2001). In total joint arthroplasty (TKA/THA), recovery typically exceeds 20 to 35 normalized points.

Is WOMAC Free to Use? Copyright and Licensing Requirements

WOMAC is not free to use or in the public domain. The questionnaire is copyrighted intellectual property owned by Professor Nicholas Bellamy. Distributing, copying, or integrating WOMAC items into electronic systems without an executed agreement constitutes copyright infringement.

  • Licensing Channels: Permissions are managed through womac.com and the Mapi Research Trust / ePROVIDE platform.
  • Commercial and Academic Trials: Industry sponsors pay per-administration licensing fees; academic investigators must also apply for formal user agreements.
  • Digital Migrations: Incorporating WOMAC into ePRO platforms requires formatting review from the licensor to preserve psychometric validity.

Types and Related Concepts

Investigators select patient-reported instruments based on anatomical focus, patient age, and licensing structure:

Instrument Items Anatomical Target Licensing Model Primary Context
WOMAC 24 items Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Proprietary (Prof. Nicholas Bellamy; licensed via Mapi / ePROVIDE) Primary outcome endpoint in osteoarthritis trials and arthroplasty registries
KOOS 42 items Knee injury and pathology Open Access / Free (Roos et al., 1998) Younger, active populations and post-traumatic knee injury cohorts
HOOS 40 items Hip injury and pathology Open Access / Free (Klässbo et al., 2003) Younger active adults and hip preservation registries
LEFS 20 items Lower extremity disorders Open Access / Free (Binkley et al., 1999) Outpatient physical therapy and orthopedic rehabilitation
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 10 items Lumbar spine (low back pain) Proprietary (Mapi Research Trust / Fairbank & Pynsent) Spine surgery and chronic low back pain trials

While KOOS and HOOS incorporate athletic domains for younger cohorts, WOMAC remains the preferred standard for regulatory trials in older populations. When systemic functional domains are required, investigators frequently supplement WOMAC with generic instruments such as PROMIS measures.

Where It Matters for Labs, Clinics, and Research Decisions

Selecting WOMAC impacts protocol design and operational execution:

  • Regulatory Efficacy Endpoints: In confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trials, WOMAC pain and function subscales serve as primary efficacy outcomes accepted by the FDA and EMA.
  • Composite Endpoints: Protocols frequently combine WOMAC clinical criteria with radiographic joint space narrowing into a composite endpoint.
  • Operational Budgeting: Licensing fees, certified language translations, and ePRO validation certificates must be integrated into study startup timelines and trial budgets.

Common Misunderstandings

  • Misunderstanding: WOMAC is free to download and administer.
    Reality: WOMAC is proprietary intellectual property. Unlicensed use compromises trial governance and regulatory compliance.
  • Misunderstanding: WOMAC measures whole-body functional status.
    Reality: WOMAC evaluates only knee and hip joint symptoms, not spine or upper-extremity conditions.
  • Misunderstanding: A higher numerical score signifies better health.
    Reality: WOMAC scores are severity-weighted: higher values indicate worse pain, greater stiffness, and higher disability.
  • Misunderstanding: Any numerical decrease demonstrates clinical efficacy.
    Reality: Reductions must reach or exceed MCID/MCII thresholds (typically 8–12 points normalized, or 21%–26% relative improvement) to reflect meaningful patient improvement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)?

WOMAC is a validated 24-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function specifically in hip and knee osteoarthritis (Bellamy et al., 1988).

How is the WOMAC questionnaire scored?

In the Likert format, 24 items are scored 0 to 4 across Pain (0–20), Stiffness (0–8), and Physical Function (0–68), totaling 0 to 96 points. In the VAS format, items are measured on a 100 mm scale. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and impairment.

Is WOMAC free to use?

No. WOMAC is copyrighted by Professor Nicholas Bellamy and administered through authorized channels, including womac.com and the Mapi Research Trust / ePROVIDE. All users must obtain an official license prior to administration.

What is MCID for WOMAC?

The MCID for WOMAC is typically a 10% to 15% reduction (8 to 12 normalized points) in conservative care. In clinical trial cohorts (Tubach et al., 2005), physical function MCII was -9.1 points (-26.0%) for knee osteoarthritis and -7.9 points (-21.1%) for hip osteoarthritis.

How does WOMAC differ from the Oswestry Disability Index?

WOMAC evaluates osteoarthritis of the knee and hip joints across 24 items. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item instrument designed specifically to measure functional impairment caused by low back pain and lumbar spine pathology.

Sources

  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. (1988). “Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.” The Journal of Rheumatology, 15(12):1833-1840. PMID: 3068365. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3068365/ (Checked 2026-11-07).
  • Mapi Research Trust / ePROVIDE. (2026). “Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC®)”. Instrument Record. https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/instruments/western-ontario-and-mcmaster-universities-osteoarthritis-index (Checked 2026-11-07).
  • Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, et al. (2005). “Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(1):29–33. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.022905. PMCID: PMC1755212. PMID: 15208174. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1755212/ (Checked 2026-11-07).
  • Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. (2001). “Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important changes of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for interpretation of group results: as illustrated by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).” Arthritis & Rheumatism, 45(4):384-391. PMID: 11501727. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501727/ (Checked 2026-11-07).

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: Scoring & Licensing

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →