Skip to main content
v2026.11,986 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Editorial · CASRAI · AI and ML research outputs

DeepMind Releases AlphaGenome 2, a Cell-Type-Conditioned DNA Model

On 11 November 2026 Google DeepMind released AlphaGenome 2, a conditional DNA sequence model. DeepMind reports 30% vs 16% causal-variant identification on TenK10K; access is non-commercial via API.

Published 13 Nov 2026· 3 minute read

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about this story

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

CASRAI is the reference for research administration — bookmark it for the next question.

What happened

On 11 November 2026, Google DeepMind published AlphaGenome 2: Deciphering how cells read DNA to better understand disease on its blog, with an accompanying technical paper. AlphaGenome 2 is a DNA sequence model that predicts how a DNA sequence, and variants within it, affect a specific human cell type or state. The first AlphaGenome was announced in June 2025 and described in a Nature paper in January 2026.

Key details

  • Conditional design. According to DeepMind, the original model predicted many tissues in parallel. AlphaGenome 2 instead takes a biological condition (a tissue, cell type or state) together with a sequence of one million DNA letters and predicts effects for that condition. Conditions can also be generated from a user’s own single-cell data, and the model can predict some unmeasured readouts from a single measurement, for example chromatin accessibility from gene activity.
  • Outputs. Gene expression, histone modifications, chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation.
  • Training data. DeepMind says the model was trained on more than 100 million individual cell profiles across 68 tissues, from human and mouse samples.
  • Headline benchmark. On the TenK10K dataset (28 primary immune cell types), DeepMind reports that AlphaGenome 2 identified causal variants 30% of the time versus 16% for the comparison, and directional gene effects 43% versus 23%. The comparison was against the original AlphaGenome fine-tuned on single-cell data and other specialised tools. These are developer-reported figures.
  • Case example. DeepMind says the model reproduced a computational finding linking a variant to ETS2 overactivation in gut macrophages in inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Access. Available now for non-commercial research through the AlphaGenome API. Commercial research access is in private preview. Colab tutorials for expression conditioning are provided. DeepMind lists “AlphaGenome 2 Skills” in Google Antigravity as planned for a later release. The announcement does not mention open model weights.
  • Stated limits. The models are “intended for research use only and have not been validated or approved for clinical or diagnostic purposes.” The GWAS-linked predictions are precomputed rather than run on demand.

What it means for researchers and research offices

For genomics groups, the practical change is that cell-type-specific variant interpretation, for example in immune cells, can be queried through an existing API rather than requiring a lab to train a model. The ability to condition on a lab’s own single-cell data is the feature most likely to matter for study-specific work, though its performance outside the published benchmarks has not been independently assessed.

For research offices and technology-transfer teams, the access split is the immediate issue. Non-commercial use is open; commercial use is by private preview only, so projects with industry funding, sponsored collaborations or spin-out intent should check terms before building workflows on API outputs. Because access is through a hosted API and not downloadable weights, data governance questions (what sequence or single-cell data may be sent to a third-party service, and under what consent and data-use agreements) fall to the research data management and compliance function. See also our guidance on research data management.

Benchmarks reported by the developer on a single dataset are a starting point, not validation. Results used in publications should state the model version, access date and conditioning inputs so they can be reproduced.

What to watch

  • Independent evaluations and peer-reviewed publication of the AlphaGenome 2 paper.
  • Terms and pricing of commercial access when it leaves private preview.
  • Whether weights or on-demand variant scoring become available.
  • DeepMind’s use-case submission form (deadline 30 November 2026), which signals the kinds of applications the team is soliciting.

Sources

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →