Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Editorial · CASRAI · Life sciences and biology

Denisovans Interbred With Humans at Least Three Separate Times, Yale Study Finds

A Yale-led study reconstructed 832 million base pairs of Denisovan DNA from 177 Near Oceanian genomes, finding evidence of at least three distinct interbreeding events — and thousands of surviving variants still shaping immune response today.

Interior of Denisova Cave in Siberia, where Denisovan fossils were first discovered
Published 10 Aug 2026· Last updated 8 Aug 2026· 3 minute read

Ask about this story

Answers are drawn from this article and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

CASRAI is the reference for research administration — bookmark it for the next question.

The people of Near Oceania carry more Denisovan DNA than any other population on Earth — and a new study led by researchers at Yale University shows why the story behind it is more complicated than a single ancient encounter. Published June 11, 2026, in Science, the research reconstructs 831.9 million base pairs of Denisovan-derived sequence from the genomes of living people, roughly three times more than any previous analysis, and finds clear genetic evidence that modern humans interbred with Denisovans on at least three separate occasions as they moved into the Pacific.

A bigger, more detailed map of an ancient mixing event

The research team, led by Serena Tucci, assistant professor of anthropology and head of Yale’s Human Evolutionary Genomics Laboratory, with associate research scientist Patrick Reilly as first author, sequenced and analyzed 177 high-coverage genomes from 12 populations across Near Oceania — Papua New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands — alongside 1,284 previously published genomes from populations worldwide. Co-authors included researchers from Yale School of Medicine, Binghamton University, Temple University, and the Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research. By comparing patterns of shared ancestry across this much larger dataset, the team was able to distinguish DNA inherited from at least three genetically distinct Denisovan-like source populations, rather than the single introgression event earlier, smaller studies had been able to resolve.

Immune genes that never stopped mattering

The reconstructed Denisovan sequence isn’t just a historical curiosity. The team identified more than 3,100 Denisovan-inherited variants with evidence of altering gene expression in living people today, concentrated in genes tied to the interferon-gamma signaling pathway — a core part of the immune system’s response to viral and bacterial infection. The pattern suggests that as anatomically modern humans moved into a new disease environment in the Pacific tens of thousands of years ago, interbreeding with a population already locally adapted handed their descendants a genetic head start against local pathogens. The study also found evidence of positive selection acting on TRPS1, a gene involved in skeletal development, hinting that Denisovan ancestry shaped more than just immunity.

Funded through NIH’s basic genomics pipeline

The work was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the National Human Genome Research Institute, both components of the National Institutes of Health — the same NIH infrastructure that underwrites much of the country’s basic population-genomics research. For CASRAI’s audience, it’s a useful example of how a foundational, hypothesis-generating genomics study (no clinical trial, no drug, no immediate application) still runs through the standard federal grant-funded research pipeline, with all the attendant compliance, data-management, and reporting obligations that come with an NIH award.

A data-sovereignty question ancient-DNA research can’t avoid

Studies like this one depend entirely on DNA voluntarily contributed by living Indigenous and descendant communities — in this case, people across Papua New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and the Solomon Islands, whose genomes carry the highest concentrations of Denisovan ancestry known. The involvement of the Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research as a named collaborating institution reflects a now-standard practice of partnering with in-country research bodies rather than sequencing samples with no ongoing local relationship. But ancient-DNA and population-genomics research as a field has a documented history of extracting genetic material from descendant communities with thin consent processes and no path for those communities to govern how their data gets reused, a gap the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics) were written specifically to address. Findings this significant — a discovery that reshapes what science understands about a population’s immune genetics — are exactly the kind of result that makes the question of who controls downstream use of that data, and who benefits from it, impossible to treat as an afterthought.

Source: Reilly, P.F., Tucci, S., et al., “Ancient Denisovan DNA Still Shapes Human Immunity in Near Oceania,” Science, June 11, 2026 (DOI: 10.1126/science.adr6749).

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →