Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Editorial · CASRAI · CRediT extensions and adjacent contribution vocabularies

A Robot Leaps Straight From Water Into Flight Like a Diving Bird — With a Tribal College as Co-Author on the Science Paper

An MIT-led team has built a bird-like robot that flies straight out of the water without paddling first, detailed in a July 2026 Science paper. Beyond the engineering, the author list itself is notable: co-authors from MIT, EPFL (Switzerland), and Northwest Indian College — a US tribal college — with field trials carried out at Lake Geneva.

A Robot Leaps Straight From Water Into Flight Like a Diving Bird — With a Tribal College as Co-Author on the Science Paper
Published 8 Aug 2026· 4 minute read

Ask about this story

Answers are drawn from this article and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

CASRAI is the reference for research administration — bookmark it for the next question.

A team led by MIT engineers has built a robot that does something most diving birds cannot: launch itself directly out of the water and into flight without paddling first. The finding, published in Science on July 9, 2026, is a small mechanical breakthrough wrapped around a genuinely notable research-administration story — the paper’s co-authors span MIT, a Swiss engineering powerhouse, and a small tribal college in Washington State.

No paddling required

The robot, called the FAAV (flapping-wing aerial-aquatic vehicle), weighs less than 300 grams — about half a pound — and is built around a central fuselage, two flexible flapping wings coated with hydrophobic nanoparticles, and a motorized steerable tail. Researchers tested three wingspans (60, 80, and 100 centimeters) and found the robot could swim at nearly 1 meter per second and fly at roughly 6 meters per second, using a similar flapping frequency of about 5 hertz for both.

The surprising part is the transition. Most diving birds paddle at the surface to build up speed before they can take off. The MIT-led team found their robot didn’t need to: by flapping through a steep, roughly 70-degree pitch angle, the FAAV could leap straight out of the water into stable flight. “If you look at birds, most birds need to paddle at the surface to take off,” lead author Raphael Zufferey, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at MIT and head of the AURA Lab, said in MIT’s announcement of the work. “And the question was, do we need the same for robots? And it turns out we don’t.”

Getting there required solving a design contradiction: the wings had to be flexible enough to minimize resistance while flapping underwater, but stiff enough to keep the robot aloft once airborne — a balance the team tuned through the hydrophobic coating and wing geometry.

A genuinely multi-institutional author list

For a research-administration audience, the mechanics are only half the story. The Science paper’s co-authors are drawn from MIT’s AURA Lab, EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) in Switzerland, and Northwest Indian College, a tribal college based in Bellingham, Washington. That is a genuinely unusual authorship footprint: a US tribal college co-authoring in one of the world’s most selective general-science journals is a rare and concrete example of authorship credit reaching beyond the small cluster of R1 universities that normally dominate Science and Nature bylines. For institutions and funders working on research-equity and broadening-participation goals, this is the kind of outcome — named co-authorship on a flagship paper, not just a diversity statement — that’s worth citing as a model.

The EPFL collaboration also matters in its own right: it reflects the kind of sustained, cross-border lab-to-lab partnership that research offices spend years trying to broker through MOUs and joint funding calls, here showing up as a shared robotics platform and a joint field campaign.

Field trials at Lake Geneva

The team’s field trials for the aerial-aquatic transitions were carried out at Lake Geneva, Switzerland — a logistical detail that underscores the collaboration was not just an author-list formality. Testing a robot that has to survive repeated water impacts, launch reliably, and then fly required physically moving hardware and people to a shared test site, coordinated across the MIT and EPFL teams.

What was funded

MIT’s announcement states the work was supported, in part, by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowship grant — the EU’s flagship early-career researcher mobility funding scheme. MIT’s write-up does not enumerate a full list of funders or grant numbers beyond that fellowship; readers who need the complete funding and acknowledgments record should consult the acknowledgments section of the Science paper directly.

Why it matters for research administrators

Strip away the flapping wings and this is a case study research offices can point to: a project that produced both a genuine engineering advance and a visible, citable instance of cross-border and cross-institution-type collaboration — including a tribal college earning first-tier authorship credit alongside MIT and EPFL. As funders and universities push harder on international partnership and broadening-participation metrics, papers like this one are useful evidence that the goal is achievable in practice, not just in policy language.

Read more: “Leaping out of the water: Aerial-aquatic locomotion with flapping wings,” Science (2026) and MIT’s announcement, “New flapping robot swims and flies like a diving bird” (MIT News, July 9, 2026).

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →