Skip to main content
v2026.11,986 entries · CC-BY 4.0
NIKOLAI elementN8 · Transparency and reviewProposednikolai-v0.3

Model Access Level

Definition

A model access level describes how deeply an outside evaluator can inspect an AI model: black-box access allows only queries and outputs, grey-box access adds limited internals or privileged information, and white-box access includes weights, activations, gradients and fine-tuning.

Also called: Access level, AL1 / AL2 / AL3, Black-box, grey-box, white-box access, Technical access, Gray-box access

NIKOLAI's proposed operational definition

NIKOLAI proposal: Model Access Level is a controlled value stating the depth of access an outside evaluator had to a model: black-box (query and observe outputs), grey-box (limited internals such as log-probabilities or activations, or privileged safety-system information), or white-box (full internals, including weights, gradients and fine-tuning), recorded together with the model version (for example a helpful-only or reduced-safeguard version) and the information provided. The three-level ladder follows arXiv 2601.11916; recording it per engagement is NIKOLAI's own proposal.

The operational definition is CASRAI's own proposal, not a definition any named organisation has agreed to. See what NIKOLAI is and is not, or browse the AI safety glossary.

Examples

Examples from published documents

  • UK AISI received 'extensive grey box access' to GPT-5.6 safeguards: monitor chain-of-thought, exact policy wording and real-time classifier-label feedback (OpenAI GPT-5.6 System Card, s.9.4.6).
  • Evaluation teams should receive, as appropriate, access to activations, gradients, logits, chains-of-thought and the version with the fewest safety mitigations, such as a helpful-only model (EU GPAI Code of Practice, Appendix 3.4).

Counter-examples

Not to be confused with

  • Deployment access tiers for customers (for example, trusted-access programmes) are not evaluator access levels, though they use similar words.

Related terms

Related AI safety terms

Terms defined under this element that are not NIKOLAI elements themselves, each as the cited document uses it. Every term is also listed in the AI safety glossary.

Black-box access
Black-box access is evaluator access that allows querying an AI model and observing its outputs, sometimes with its chain-of-thought, but not inspecting internals such as activations, gradients or weights.
Source: Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations (arXiv 2601.11916)
Grey-box access
Grey-box access is limited evaluator access to an AI model's internals, such as input embeddings, hidden neural activations or log-probabilities, falling between query-only black-box access and full white-box access.
Source: Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations (arXiv 2601.11916)
White-box access
White-box access is full evaluator access to an AI system, including its activations and gradients and the ability to fine-tune the model, which enables evaluation techniques that querying alone cannot support.
Source: Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations (arXiv 2601.11916)
Railfree version
A railfree version is OpenAI's term for a model version supplied to evaluators with system-level content filters disabled, used in GPT-5.6 biological-risk testing.
Source: OpenAI GPT-5.6 System Card
Structured access
Structured access is controlled access to an AI model's capabilities for vetted users; Meta's framework sees benefits in letting trusted researchers reach chemical and biological capabilities with reduced mitigations via structured access controls.
Source: Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2

Source of record

Where this definition comes from

  • Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations (arXiv 2601.11916), Abstract

    “Based on the taxonomy, we propose three descriptive access levels: AL1 (black-box model access and minimal information), AL2 (grey-box model access and substantial information), and AL3 (white-box model access and comprehensive information), to support clearer communication between evaluators, frontier AI companies, and policymakers.”

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11916
  • OpenAI GPT-5.6 System Card, s.9.4.6

    “UK AISI was provided with extensive grey box access: access to chain-of-thought of the safety reasoning monitor, exact policy wording, and real-time feedback on classifier labels that would not be accessible to real-world attackers.”

    https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6
  • EU GPAI Code of Practice, Safety and Security Chapter, Measure 3.5

    “Such access to a model may be provided by Signatories through an API, on-premise access (including transport), access via Signatory-provided hardware, or by making the model parameters publicly available for download, as appropriate.”

    https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/118119

Crosswalk

How named organisations use this concept

Every row below is a shadow mapping. A shadow row is CASRAI's own reading of a published document. No lab, evaluator or regulator named on a shadow row has declared, endorsed, or been consulted on it. That changes only when an organisation files its own Mapping Declaration.
OrganisationTheir term, as publishedMatch & verificationSource
Academic proposal (arXiv 2601.11916)Shadow mapping
Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations
“"Black-box access (i.e. access to query the system and observe outputs); grey-box access (i.e. limited access to model internals such as input embeddings, hidden neural activations, or log-probabilities); and white-box access (i.e. full access to the system including access to activations, gradients, and the ability to fine-tune the model)"; levels "AL1", "AL2", "AL3" combine model access with information provided.”
An academic proposal (17 Jan 2026), not a developer or regulator commitment. The authors state they believe the levels correspond to the EU Code of Practice's standards of appropriate access.
exactEQ
confidence: high
Expanding External Access To Frontier AI Models For Dangerous Capability Evaluations (arXiv 2601.11916)
EUShadow mapping
EU GPAI Code of Practice, Safety and Security Chapter
“Appendix 3.4: access "including, as appropriate, access to model activations, gradients, logits (or other forms of raw model outputs), chains-of-thought, and/or other technical details, and access to the model version(s) with the fewest safety mitigations implemented (such as a helpful-only model version, if it exists)"; Measure 3.5: access "through an API, on-premise access (including transport), access via Signatory-provided hardware, or by making the model parameters publicly available for download".”
Lists access items and delivery modes but no named levels.
closeCL
confidence: high
EU GPAI Code of Practice, Safety and Security Chapter
OpenAIShadow mapping
OpenAI GPT-5.6 System Card
“"UK AISI was provided with extensive grey box access: access to chain-of-thought of the safety reasoning monitor, exact policy wording, and real-time feedback on classifier labels" (s.9.4.6); SecureBio received "a railfree version of GPT-5.6 Sol. For the assessment, system-level biological risk content filters were disabled" (s.9.1.1.8).”
OpenAI's 'grey box' here describes privileged information about the safeguard system rather than model internals, a broader sense than the arXiv definition.
closeCL
confidence: medium
OpenAI GPT-5.6 System Card
Frontier Model ForumShadow mapping
FMF Third-Party Assessments technical report
“"The type and level of access vary by function – confirmation may need model access to replicate tests alongside documentation of methodologies and results, while robustness typically requires more extensive hands-on interaction" (5); open-ended assessors may need "a version with limited safety training" (3.1); future work includes "appropriate model access levels" (6).”
No numbered scale.
closeCL
confidence: medium
FMF Third-Party Assessments
AI Evaluator Forum (AEF-1)Shadow mapping
AEF-1: Minimum Operating Conditions for Independent Third Party AI Evaluations
“"1.1 Technical Access Requirement: The evaluator secured sufficient technical access to assess the specific system characteristics being evaluated"; "At a minimum, evaluators must have open-ended black-box access (via a web UI, an API or both, depending on the requirements of the evaluation)".”
Verified against the AEF-1 PDF.
closeCL
confidence: high
AEF-1: Minimum Operating Conditions for Independent Third Party AI Evaluations (v1, 4 Dec 2025)
xAIShadow mapping
Grok 4.6 model card
“"an unrestricted configuration of Grok 4.6" provided "to third-party evaluators" (§7).”
Names the model configuration, not the access depth.
narrowNR
confidence: medium
Grok 4.6 model card
AnthropicShadow mapping
Anthropic Risk Report, August 2026
“External testers "all have blocking classifiers enabled, except for a small number of trusted external testers (generally fewer than 10) specifically testing dangerous biological capabilities. Access is for a limited period of time."”
Safeguard state of the accessed model, one input to an access record.
narrowNR
confidence: medium
Anthropic Risk Report, August 2026
What do these codes mean?
exact
The source term is equivalent to this element
close
The source term is close but not equivalent to this element
broad
The source term is broader than this element
narrow
The source term is narrower than this element
none
No mapping claim — used for false-friend and declared-but-undefined rows
EQ
Equivalent
CL
Close
BR
Source is broader than the element
NR
Source is narrower than the element
FF
False friend — same or similar label, different meaning
DU
Declared but undefined by the source
UV
Unverified

Divergence

Where sources materially disagree

'Grey box' is used in two senses. The arXiv taxonomy means limited access to model internals (embeddings, activations, log-probabilities); OpenAI's GPT-5.6 card uses 'grey box access' for privileged information about the safety system (monitor reasoning, policy wording, classifier labels). A record should state the items received, not only the label.

Gap

No developer or regulator has adopted named access levels. The EU Code of Practice lists access items without levels, the Frontier Model Forum lists 'appropriate model access levels' as future work, and the AL1-AL3 ladder is an academic proposal.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →