Source of record
Where this definition comes from
Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4, §4(4)
“We will maintain a process for Anthropic staff to submit anonymous or identified reports regarding potential noncompliance with this policy. Staff will have more than one option for who receives these reports, including the RSO, and at least one executive who does not report to the RSO.”
https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/0bacdc8440ea96e62a8766d99ebe1d4eea6d5f3a.pdfCalifornia SB 53, Labor Code 1107(b)
“Covered employee: an employee responsible for assessing, managing, or addressing risk of critical safety incidents.”
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53
Crosswalk
How named organisations use this concept
Every row below is a shadow mapping. It is CASRAI's own reading of a published document. No lab, evaluator or regulator named here has declared, endorsed, or been consulted on this mapping. That will change only when an organisation files its own Mapping Declaration — see the non-endorsement policy.
| Organisation | Their term, as published | Match | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic Anthropic RSP v3.4 / Advanced AI Framework | “§4(4) "Noncompliance reporting", verbatim: "We will maintain a process for Anthropic staff to submit anonymous or identified reports regarding potential noncompliance with this policy. Staff will have more than one option for who receives these reports, including the RSO, and at least one executive who does not report to the RSO. When we receive a report, we will promptly investigate, take appropriate and proportional corrective action if it is substantiated, and document the report and our findings. We will provide quarterly updates to the Board regarding reports of potential noncompliance, whether substantiated or not ... we will protect reporters from retaliation, and where a report concerns the conduct of the RSO, at least one recipient will be a member of the Board." §4(5) "Employee agreements": non-disparagement clauses may not "preclude raising safety concerns, nor ... preclude disclosure of the existence of that clause." AAF: "anonymous internal channels for employees and contractors to flag compliance concerns or activities that pose serious public safety risks" (p.11).” Also cites {AAF}. | exact confidence: high | Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy v3.4 |
| OpenAI OpenAI Preparedness Framework v2 | “"Any employee can raise concerns about potential violations of this policy, or about its implementation, via our Raising Concerns Policy." (§5.1)” | exact confidence: high | OpenAI Preparedness Framework v2 |
| xAI xAI Risk Management Framework (Aug 2025) / Frontier AI Framework (30 Jun 2026) | “Aug 2025 RMF: anonymous employee reporting of RMF non-adherence with protection from retaliation. June 2026: employee escalation is a detection channel; "No whistleblower or non-retaliation provisions" (brief finding).” Also cites {FAIF26} (PDF metadata reads 'Privileged/Confidential DRAFT working FRAMEWORK DOC'; draft-vs-final status unresolved, open-VERIFY register item 4). Note the apparent regression: the Aug 2025 RMF had anonymous reporting with retaliation protection, but the June 2026 FAIF is found to have none -- record both dates rather than a single current value. | close confidence: medium | xAI Risk Management Framework (20 Aug 2025) |
| Meta Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2 | “"all employees who in good faith report non-compliance or decline to engage in unlawful conduct will be explicitly protected from adverse employment action and retaliation." (§2.3.1)” | exact confidence: high | Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2 |
| California SB 53 California SB 53 | “"Covered employee: an employee responsible for assessing, managing, or addressing risk of critical safety incidents." (Labor Code 1107(b)); anti-retaliation, notice, anonymous internal channel "including a monthly update to the person who made the disclosure" (1107.1).” | exact confidence: high | California SB 53 |
Related, not mapped
Pointers that are not crosswalk claims
These sources mention this concept but do not define or map it clearly enough to count as a crosswalk row — noted here so the research is visible without overstating it as a mapping.
- METR
Quotes Anthropic's anonymous noncompliance notification channel to the RSO.
METR
