Roadmap Item

NIKOLAI proposal: a Roadmap Item is a dated, non-binding future goal with a trackable status value (e.g. not met / met / slipped), published so that its completion or slippage against the stated date can be monitored independently. This wording is a NIKOLAI editorial synthesis, not a quotation from any single source.

This is CASRAI's own proposed definition, not a definition any named organisation has agreed to. See what NIKOLAI is and is not.

Source of record

Where this definition comes from

Anthropic Risk Report (August 2026), §3.7.1 (quoted)
“Achieve an 'eyes on everything' state for our internal AI development. We will comprehensively gather, centralize, and maintain logs for all critical AI-development activities ...”
https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/f61d49fa5596956a5dec75fea0e973bf6a6a8378/Redacted%20Risk%20Report%20August%202026%20.pdf

Crosswalk

How named organisations use this concept

Every row below is a shadow mapping. It is CASRAI's own reading of a published document. No lab, evaluator or regulator named here has declared, endorsed, or been consulted on this mapping. That will change only when an organisation files its own Mapping Declaration — see the non-endorsement policy.

Organisation	Their term, as published	Match	Source
Anthropic Anthropic Risk Report (August 2026) / Frontier Safety Roadmap	“"Achieve an 'eyes on everything' state for our internal AI development. We will comprehensively gather, centralize, and maintain logs for all critical AI-development activities ..." (quoted in §3.7.1); status "Not met; target date 1 Jan 2027 in the Frontier Safety Roadmap." Roadmap has "dated goals across Security, Safeguards, Alignment, Cross-cutting and Policy, with an update log" (discovery).” The source document also gives a further dated goal from Amodei's 'The Urgency of Interpretability' ({INTERP}): interpretability 'can reliably detect most model problems' by 2027 -- this predates and is not confirmed by the Roadmap cited here, and the source itself flags [VERIFY] whether the Risk Report or Roadmap tracks progress against it; not resolved in this pass. The source table also cites a bracket tag {DAN} for this row that does not resolve to any URL in the supplied sources list -- it is dropped here rather than invented; treat that sub-claim as uncited until resolved.	exact confidence: high	Anthropic Risk Report (August 2026)

Related, not mapped

Pointers that are not crosswalk claims

These sources mention this concept but do not define or map it clearly enough to count as a crosswalk row — noted here so the research is visible without overstating it as a mapping.

OpenAI
"We will evolve our Preparedness Framework to bring these safeguards together across training and deployment" (What's next). Undated.
OpenAI, 'Pacing Model Development of Cyber Capabilities'
Google DeepMind
May add TCLs for more risks as threat modelling develops (para., model card).
Gemini 3.7 Flash model card
xAI
"We plan to add additional thresholds tied to other benchmarks." (Dec 2025, p.6); "continue to work towards" naturalistic evaluation environments (June 2026). Note: the June 2026 half of this quote is from {FAIF26}, whose PDF metadata reads 'Privileged/Confidential DRAFT working FRAMEWORK DOC' with draft-vs-final status unresolved (open-VERIFY register item 4).
xAI Frontier AI Framework (31 Dec 2025)
Meta
Planned research on evaluation quality, mitigations and post-deployment monitoring (§5.2); model spec committed with "no date".
Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2
Frontier Model Forum
Forthcoming FMF reports promised (para.).
Frontier Model Forum, Risk Taxonomy and Thresholds