Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0

OSPF (CASRAI)

Open Science Practice Certification — Foundation

LevelFoundationOSPOSPF (CASRAI)
6
Lessons
6 modules
7
Domains
Exam blueprint
3
Exam items
Per attempt
70%
Pass mark
Fixed, uncurved
90
Retake wait
Days

What you earn

The credential itself

Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal OSPF (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

Specimen. Issued as a signed PDF and as a machine-readable Open Badge; the holder and code shown are illustrative.
How it appears on your CV

Certifications

OSPF (CASRAI)Open Science Practice, Foundation

CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-OSP-2026-KF09BC

casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-OSP-2026-KF09BC

Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.

It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.

About this credential

What it covers

Body of knowledge

Exam blueprint

The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.

Domains and weights7 domains · 3 scored items
DomainWeight
Open science: concepts, values and the international policy frameworkF1
16%1 item
Open access routes, versions, licensing and rights retentionF2
22%1 item
Repositories, deposit workflows and self-archivingF3
14%1 item
The economics of open access and equitable publishingF4
12%1 item
Open research practices: preprints, open peer review, preregistration, open data, materials and OERF5
20%1 item
Funder mandates and institutional compliance operationsF6
11%1 item
Open infrastructure, monitoring, metrics and bibliodiversityF7
5%1 item
Total100%

Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.

Syllabus

6 modules, 6 lessons

Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.

6 modules · 6 lessons

Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.

  1. Module 1

    F1

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.What open science is, and what it is notLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • On completion the learner can:
      • [R] State the components of open science and explain that they are separable — a paper can be open access with closed data, data can be open with an irreproducible analysis.
      • [R] Name the four core values and six guiding principles of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science and distinguish them from its areas of action.
      • [A] Given a scenario, identify which instrument governs an expectation: international recommendation, funder policy, grant agreement, institutional policy, journal policy, or disciplinary norm.
      • [A] Apply "as open as possible, as closed as necessary" to a case with a genuine constraint, and distinguish a genuine constraint from a pretext.
      • [An] State fairly at least three substantive critiques of open science.
  2. Module 2

    F2

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.The routes: gold, green, diamond, bronze, hybridLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • [R] Define gold, green, diamond/platinum, bronze, hybrid and black open access precisely, including the licence status of each.
      • [A] Classify a real article into a route from the available evidence — licence statement, venue, repository record, publisher page — and justify the classification.
      • [An] Explain why bronze open access is not a durable form of access and what it fails to permit.
      • [A] Evaluate a candidate venue against a stated funder requirement using DOAJ and SHERPA services.
      • [An] Assess a suspect venue on evidence rather than on a list.
  3. Module 3

    F3

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Versions, licences and rightsLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • [R] Distinguish the submitted version/preprint, the author accepted manuscript, and the version of record, and state what may lawfully be done with each.
      • [A] Determine, for a given publisher agreement, which version may be deposited, where, and after what embargo.
      • [R] State what CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-ND, CC BY-NC, CC BY-NC-SA, CC BY-NC-ND and CC0 each permit.
      • [An] Explain why funders generally reject NC and ND terms even though both are "open".
      • [A] Advise an author on retaining the rights they need before signing, and on the options once they have signed.
      • [An] Choose between CC BY and CC0 for an article and for a dataset, and justify the difference.
  4. Module 4

    F4

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Repositories and depositLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • [A] Select an appropriate repository for a given output type and discipline and justify the choice against named criteria.
      • [A] Deposit an output correctly: version, licence, embargo, metadata, identifiers, funder acknowledgement.
      • [An] Diagnose why a deposited output is not appearing in a funder or national monitor.
      • [R] Explain what repository certification (CoreTrustSeal) certifies, and that it is not a credential held by a person.
  5. Module 5

    F5

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Preprints, open peer review and open research practicesLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • [A] Advise an author on whether, where and when to post a preprint, including the consequences for journal submission, media handling and citation.
      • [A] Cite a preprint correctly and distinguishably from the version of record.
      • [R] Distinguish open identities, open reports, open participation and post-publication review.
      • [R] Explain what preregistration and Registered Reports are, and where each is registered.
      • [A] Draft a data availability statement and a code availability statement that would actually allow a reader to obtain the material.
  6. Module 6

    F6

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Mandates in practice: answering the compliance questionLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • [A] Determine which open-access obligation applies to a given output, from which funder, and by when.
      • [A] Determine whether a proposed venue satisfies that obligation and show the reasoning.
      • [A] Advise an author who has already published non-compliantly on the available remedies.
      • [R] Describe the structure of US federal public access and state that implementation is agency-by-agency.

Assessment

How the exam works

The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.

Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.

Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.

Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.

Certifying authority

Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD

CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.

CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.

What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

The ladder

Other levels of Open Science Practice

Levels are independent purchases. There is no prerequisite chain — sit whichever level matches the work you already do.

All CASRAI credentials

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →