Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0

SAWF (CASRAI)

Scientific & Academic Writing Certification — Foundation

LevelFoundationSAWSAWF (CASRAI)
8
Lessons
8 modules
8
Domains
Exam blueprint
2
Exam items
Per attempt
70%
Pass mark
Fixed, uncurved
90
Retake wait
Days

What you earn

The credential itself

Pass the examination and CASRAI issues this certificate and the post-nominal SAWF (CASRAI), signed by the Programme Director and verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

Specimen. Issued as a signed PDF and as a machine-readable Open Badge; the holder and code shown are illustrative.
How it appears on your CV

Certifications

SAWF (CASRAI)Scientific & Academic Writing, Foundation

CASRAI·Issued Mar 2026·Credential ID CASRAI-SAW-2026-E57T03

casrai.org/verify/CASRAI-SAW-2026-E57T03

Every certificate is issued under the signature of Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director of CASRAI Certification, who sets the syllabus, blueprint and pass mark for this credential.

It certifies that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published on this page — and anyone can confirm it from the verification code, without an account and without contacting us.

About this credential

What it covers

Body of knowledge

Exam blueprint

The exam is assembled to these weights on every attempt. They are published before purchase because a blueprint you cannot see is not a blueprint.

Domains and weights8 domains · 2 scored items
DomainWeight
Genre, venue and disciplinary convention1
12%1 item
Framing the contribution: the introduction as argument2
14%1 item
Methods, results and discussion3
18%1 item
Title, abstract and audience-facing summaries4
12%1 item
Displaying evidence: tables, figures and statistics in prose5
12%1 item
Sources, citation practice and text reuse6
11%1 item
Authorship, contribution, disclosure and AI assistance7
11%1 item
Submission, the review exchange and collaborative production8
10%1 item
Total100%

Item counts are approximate. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the weights above, so the exact number of items per domain varies between attempts.

Syllabus

8 modules, 8 lessons

Every lesson and every learning outcome is listed. The lesson bodies open on enrolment; nothing else about the course is withheld.

8 modules · 8 lessons

Lesson material opens once you are enrolled. The full syllabus and every learning outcome are shown here so you can judge the coverage before you pay.

  1. Module 1

    F1

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Genre, venue and the shape of a research paperLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • By the end, the learner can:
      • Name the principal article types and state what each is for. [R]
      • Explain IMRaD as a claim–support structure rather than a template. [R]
      • Extract the binding constraints from a target venue's author instructions before drafting. [A]
      • Identify, for a given study design, which reporting guideline applies, by locating it in the EQUATOR Network library rather than from memory. [A]
  2. Module 2

    F2

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.The introduction as argumentLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • Distinguish an abstract from an introduction on audience, tense, presence of findings, and standalone-ness. [R]
      • Write an introduction that moves from established context to a specific unresolved problem, to the consequence of leaving it unresolved, to the present work's response — and stops. [C]
      • Distinguish a gap from a problem and build on the latter. [An]
      • Select a defensible novelty claim from a graded set. [E]
  3. Module 3

    F3

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Methods as a reproducibility instrumentLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • State the obligation a methods section owes to a future reader rather than to a reviewer. [R]
      • Draft a methods section from which a competent reader in the field could repeat the work or evaluate whether it was done well. [C]
      • Identify, in a published methods section, the omissions that make the work irreproducible. [An]
  4. Module 4

    F4

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Results and discussion: observation and inferenceLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • Report results without interpreting them, and interpret them without re-reporting them. [C]
      • Locate, in a supplied results section, every sentence that crosses into inference. [An]
      • Structure a discussion that opens with the answer, relates it to prior work, states limitations a critical reader would raise, and concludes proportionately. [C]
      • Write a null result in language that does not overstate it. [A]
  5. Module 5

    F5

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Title, abstract and the summaries other people readLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • Write a title that states the finding or the question, carries searchable terms, names the design where the venue expects it, and survives being read out of context. [C]
      • Write an unstructured abstract containing background, what was done, what was found with numbers, and what follows, within a word limit. [C]
      • Write a structured abstract to prescribed headings without losing the argument. [C]
      • Distinguish a plain-language summary from a regulatory lay summary and from an impact statement. [R]
      • Judge whether a graphical abstract states the paper's claim or decorates it. [E]
  6. Module 6

    F6

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Tables, figures and numbers in proseLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • Decide whether a body of evidence should be a table, a figure or a sentence, and justify it. [E]
      • Write captions that let a table or figure be understood without the body text. [C]
      • Report an effect with its precision, its comparison and its direction. [A]
      • Identify the standard statistical misreports in supplied text. [An]
  7. Module 7

    F7

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Sources, citation practice and text reuseLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • Cite the primary source of a claim, and cite a secondary source explicitly as such where the primary is genuinely unavailable. [A]
      • Verify that each cited work supports the claim attached to it. [A]
      • Operate a reference manager as a workflow. [A]
      • Distinguish plagiarism, text recycling, and redundant publication, and state the correct remedy for each. [An]
  8. Module 8

    F8

    1 lesson

    1. Locked.Authorship, disclosure, AI, and getting the paper outLocked

      On completion you will be able to

      • State the four ICMJE authorship criteria and apply them, conjunctively, to a supplied contributor list. [A]
      • Place a disclosure of generative-AI use in the correct part of a manuscript under the target venue's current policy. [A]
      • Write a cover letter that tells an editor what the paper claims, why it fits the venue, and what declarations accompany it. [C]
      • Read a decision letter and separate the editor's instruction from the reviewers' opinions. [An]

Assessment

How the exam works

The exam is closed-book and multiple choice. Each attempt draws a fresh form to the domain weights above, so no two attempts are the same paper and no answer key circulates. The pass mark is 70% and is fixed — there is no curve, no quota and no adjustment by cohort.

Scoring is immediate. You are shown your overall result and, for every item, the option you chose, the correct option and the reasoning behind it — whether you passed or not. A failed attempt may be retaken after 90 days. The wait exists so a retake is a second attempt at the material rather than a second attempt at remembering the paper.

Forms are assembled to the blueprint above or not at all: where a domain cannot yet be sampled to that standard, the exam declines to start rather than issue an unbalanced paper. Your material and progress are never affected, and there is no time limit on when you sit.

Passing candidates are issued a certificate with a verification code. Anyone can check that code on our public verification page without an account and without contacting us.

Certifying authority

Signed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD

CASRAI’s certification programme is academically and medically directed by Dr. Diana Nieves Castro, MD, Programme Director, who sets the syllabus and blueprint for this credential and signs every certificate issued under it.

CASRAI has maintained the terminology and reporting standards of research administration for over a decade. It assumed leadership of the CRediT contributor-roles taxonomy in 2014 and carried it through to adoption as ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022, now in use by publishers, funders and institutions worldwide. This examination is drawn from that body of work.

What the credential certifies: that its holder passed the CASRAI examination for this course on the date shown, scored against the blueprint and pass mark published above — verifiable by anyone, permanently, from the code on its face.

The ladder

Other levels of Scientific & Academic Writing

Levels are independent purchases. There is no prerequisite chain — sit whichever level matches the work you already do.

All CASRAI credentials

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →