Direct comparison
Dataverse vs Figshare Compared
Dataverse is open-source, self-hostable repository software; Figshare is commercial hosted SaaS. Compare cost, licensing, curation, and certification.
Ask about Dataverse vs Figshare Compared
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do Dataverse, Figshare compare side by side?
The table below compares Dataverse, Figshare across 12 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it is through governance.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Dataverse | Figshare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source repository software (self-hostable) plus the free, public Harvard Dataverse instance | Commercial, centrally hosted SaaS platform (Digital Science) |
| Origin | Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science (IQSS), first released 2006 | Founded 2011 by Mark Hahnel; developed/backed by Digital Science since 2012 |
| Self-hosting option | Yes — institutions/consortia can install and run their own instance | No — always Digital Science-hosted, even for the branded institutional product |
| Cost to institution | Software free; self-hosting costs are IT/infrastructure, not licensing | Free public tier for individuals; Figshare for Institutions and Figshare+ are paid subscriptions |
| Individual researcher free option | Yes — free deposit into Harvard Dataverse, no institutional subscription needed | Yes — free deposit on public figshare.com, no institutional subscription needed |
| Default license | CC0 strongly encouraged by default; configurable per collection | CC-BY by default on figshare.com; CC0 also available; broader CC suite on institutional/Figshare+ tiers |
| Curation/review | Varies by self-hosted instance/collection — no single uniform policy | No pre-publication review on free tier; Figshare+ adds expert review for journal-linked submissions |
| CoreTrustSeal certification | Harvard Dataverse itself is CoreTrustSeal certified | Not certified as a platform — supports institutional customers pursuing their own certification |
| Other certification | Varies by self-hosted instance | ISO/IEC 27001 (Digital Science) |
| Institutional branding | Full control if self-hosted (own domain, own configuration) | White-labelled instance of the same underlying commercial platform |
| DOI registration | Typically DataCite (or Handle, per instance configuration) | DataCite |
| Governance | Community-governed via the Global Dataverse Community Consortium (GDCC); Harvard hosts the flagship instance | Single commercial vendor (Digital Science) |
Common questions
Common questions about Dataverse vs Figshare
Is Dataverse free?
+
The software is free and open source, and depositing into Harvard Dataverse (the flagship public instance) is free. Running your own self-hosted installation is free of licensing fees but requires your own server infrastructure and IT staff time.
Is Figshare free?
+
The public figshare.com site is free for individual researchers, with storage and per-file limits. Figshare for Institutions and Figshare+ are paid products.
Can my institution self-host Figshare the way it can with Dataverse?
+
No. Figshare has no self-hosted option — institutions subscribe to a Digital Science-hosted, white-labelled instance rather than installing the software on their own infrastructure.
Which one is CoreTrustSeal certified?
+
Harvard Dataverse itself holds CoreTrustSeal certification. Figshare as a platform does not; it provides template support to help institutional customers pursue their own certification for a branded instance, which is a different claim from platform-wide certification.
Going deeper
