Direct comparison
OSF vs. Figshare: Key Differences Explained
OSF vs. Figshare compared: project workspace vs. deposit repository, free storage limits, institutional pricing, DOIs, and preregistration support.
Ask about OSF vs. Figshare: Key Differences Explained
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do OSF, Figshare compare side by side?
The table below compares OSF, Figshare across 10 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it's built for through best fit.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | OSF | Figshare |
|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | Managing an active research project (files, collaborators, version history, preregistration) | Depositing a finished output and getting a DOI/citation |
| Operator | Center for Open Science (nonprofit) | Digital Science (commercial) |
| Core unit | Project, with nested components | Item (dataset, figure, code, poster, etc.) |
| Free storage limit | 5GB per private project/component, 50GB per public project/component (per-component, so effectively extensible); 5GB per-file cap | 20GB per file, 20GB private storage per free account |
| External storage add-ons | Google Drive, Dropbox, GitHub, Amazon S3 and more -- don't count against the storage cap | No equivalent free add-on extension path |
| Preregistration | Yes -- OSF Registries, purpose-built for preregistration/registered reports | No preregistration workflow |
| DOI registration | Via DataCite, on request when a project/registration is made public | Via DataCite, automatically on publish |
| Default license | Selected per project (no platform-wide default) | CC-BY (CC0 also available) |
| Institutional tier | OSF Institutions -- branding/SSO/admin layer on the same free platform, reported membership pricing in the low five figures/year | Figshare for Institutions -- up to 5TB/file, quote-based pricing tied to storage and contract |
| Best fit | Managing the project before, during, and after data collection | Depositing a specific finished dataset or supplementary file for a paper |
Common questions
Common questions about OSF vs Figshare
Can I use both OSF and Figshare for the same project?
+
Yes, and many research teams do -- OSF to manage the working project and preregister the design, then Figshare (or another repository) to deposit the finished dataset once a paper is ready to submit.
Which one should I list in my data management plan?
+
If your DMP only needs a final-deposit repository, Figshare's simplicity is usually the faster fit. If the plan needs to cover active project management or a preregistration, OSF is the better fit for that portion of the plan.
Does OSF or Figshare have a lower free storage limit?
+
Figshare's free tier allows more per single file (20GB) with a flat 20GB private-storage cap. OSF caps each project/component at 5GB (private) or 50GB (public), but because every component gets its own allowance and external add-on storage is uncapped, an OSF project can practically hold far more than Figshare's flat limit.
