Direct comparison
OSF vs. Figshare: Key Differences Explained
OSF vs. Figshare compared: project workspace vs. deposit repository, free storage limits, institutional pricing, DOIs, and preregistration support.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · free to try
Ask about OSF vs. Figshare: Key Differences Explained
Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.
An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.
Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do OSF, Figshare compare side by side?
The table below compares OSF, Figshare across 10 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it's built for through best fit.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | OSF | Figshare |
|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | Managing an active research project (files, collaborators, version history, preregistration) | Depositing a finished output and getting a DOI/citation |
| Operator | Center for Open Science (nonprofit) | Digital Science (commercial) |
| Core unit | Project, with nested components | Item (dataset, figure, code, poster, etc.) |
| Free storage limit | 5GB per private project/component, 50GB per public project/component (per-component, so effectively extensible); 5GB per-file cap | 20GB per file, 20GB private storage per free account |
| External storage add-ons | Google Drive, Dropbox, GitHub, Amazon S3 and more -- don't count against the storage cap | No equivalent free add-on extension path |
| Preregistration | Yes -- OSF Registries, purpose-built for preregistration/registered reports | No preregistration workflow |
| DOI registration | Via DataCite, on request when a project/registration is made public | Via DataCite, automatically on publish |
| Default license | Selected per project (no platform-wide default) | CC-BY (CC0 also available) |
| Institutional tier | OSF Institutions -- branding/SSO/admin layer on the same free platform, reported membership pricing in the low five figures/year | Figshare for Institutions -- up to 5TB/file, quote-based pricing tied to storage and contract |
| Best fit | Managing the project before, during, and after data collection | Depositing a specific finished dataset or supplementary file for a paper |
Common questions
Common questions about OSF vs Figshare
Can I use both OSF and Figshare for the same project?
+
Yes, and many research teams do -- OSF to manage the working project and preregister the design, then Figshare (or another repository) to deposit the finished dataset once a paper is ready to submit.
Which one should I list in my data management plan?
+
If your DMP only needs a final-deposit repository, Figshare's simplicity is usually the faster fit. If the plan needs to cover active project management or a preregistration, OSF is the better fit for that portion of the plan.
Does OSF or Figshare have a lower free storage limit?
+
Figshare's free tier allows more per single file (20GB) with a flat 20GB private-storage cap. OSF caps each project/component at 5GB (private) or 50GB (public), but because every component gets its own allowance and external add-on storage is uncapped, an OSF project can practically hold far more than Figshare's flat limit.
