Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A 2023 preprint that listed ChatGPT as a co-author and was subsequently corrected to remove it
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
Disclosing in the methods that ChatGPT was used to draft the abstract while keeping the human authors solely in the byline
Editorial commentary
ICMJE, COPE, WAME and most major publishers have converged on rejecting AI as an author because authorship requires the ability to be held accountable for the integrity of the work, to consent to publication, and to declare conflicts of interest — none of which an AI system can do. AI contributions must instead be disclosed in methods, acknowledgements, or a dedicated AI-use statement.
References
- ICMJE Recommendations (2023 update)
- COPE Position Statement on Authorship and AI Tools (2023)
- Nature Editorial Policy on Generative AI (2023)
Also known as
AI authorship · Chatbot author
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="AI as author"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-as-author" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"name": "AI as author",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-as-author",
"description": "The disallowed practice of listing a generative AI system (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) in the author byline or contributor list of a scholarly work, on the rationale that AI cannot meet authorship criteria requiring accountability, agreement, and the capacity to take public responsibility.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/generative-ai-use-and-disclosure/",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-as-author",
"sameAs": [
"AI authorship",
"Chatbot author"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}







