Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Endodontic File: What It Is, Parts, Types and FDA Class

Endodontic file explained: FDA product code EKS, Class I and 510(k) exempt, the design features that distinguish files, and AAE-reported fracture rates.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

General product and regulatory information for laboratory, clinic and supply staff. It is not medical advice and does not describe clinical technique.

Short answer

An endodontic file is a hand-held dental instrument used on the inside of a tooth’s root canal. In the United States the FDA lists it as “File, pulp canal, endodontic” (product code EKS), a Class I device under 21 CFR 872.4565 that is exempt from 510(k) premarket notification. Files differ in taper, cross-section, pitch and alloy, and an endodontist-society article counts roughly 150 to 200 file types on the market.

Definition and scope

The federal regulation for dental hand instruments, 21 CFR 872.4565, identifies a dental hand instrument as “a hand-held device intended to perform various tasks in general dentistry”. Its list of covered instruments includes an “endodontic pulp canal file” alongside related root canal items such as the endodontic pulp canal reamer and the endodontic broach. The same category covers many other hand instruments; see our guide to dental surgical instruments for the wider group and surgical curettes for a neighbouring instrument family.

This page covers what the device is and how it is classified and described. It does not cover how a clinician uses it on a patient.

Is an endodontic file a regulated medical device?

Yes. The FDA product classification database (page last updated 2026-10-26, checked 2026-10-31) records the following for code EKS:

  • Device name: File, pulp canal, endodontic
  • Regulation: 21 CFR 872.4565, regulation description “Dental hand instrument”
  • Device class: 1, with “general controls” named in the regulation
  • Submission type: 510(k) exempt
  • GMP exempt: No
  • Review panel: Dental; not an implanted device and not life-sustaining or life-supporting
  • Recognized consensus standards listed by FDA: ANSI/ADA Standard No. 58-2010 (R2015), Root Canal Files, Type H (Hedstrom), and ISO 21850-1:2020, Dentistry, Materials for dental instruments, Part 1: Stainless steel

The regulation states the 510(k) exemption applies to a device made of the same materials used before May 28, 1976, subject to the limitations in 21 CFR 872.9. “Exempt” describes the premarket pathway only. It is not a statement about how any particular file performs, and the product classification entry does not say that manufacturers’ quality-system obligations are waived: the database lists “GMP exempt: No”.

What design features distinguish one file from another?

The American Association of Endodontists’ Communiqué article “Trends in Rotary File Design” (Dr. Matthew Malek, 2 November 2025, checked 2026-10-31) describes the features manufacturers vary.

Feature What the AAE article says
Thickness and taper “In general, a file’s thickness and taper are directly related to its overall mass.”
Cross-section “A larger cross-sectional mass increases stiffness”; the article states a square cross-section generally exhibits greater stiffness than a rectangular one.
Pitch Defined as “the distance between two consecutive cutting edges when viewed laterally”.
Alloy treatment Engineers have modified the nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloy’s phase transformation between austenite and martensite.

Because the article puts the market at “approximately 150 to 200 different file types”, two products with similar names can differ in several of these features at once. A supply catalogue entry is therefore best read against the manufacturer’s own instructions for use, not against a generic label such as “NiTi rotary file”.

Why do endodontic files break?

A second AAE Communiqué article, “Broken Instruments, Clinical Decision Making Algorithm” (Dr. Michael Solomonov, 2 November 2020, checked 2026-10-31), reports that “the reported frequency rate for fractured instruments varies from 0.7% to 6% of cases”. It gives the common reasons for fracture of rotary NiTi files as “flexural and/or torsional fatigue”. It also notes that “NiTi instrument separation can happen without any sign of fatigue”.

The 2025 article adds that NiTi files can be susceptible to torsional fracture, “particularly in tight or constricted canals”, and that the same alloy can fail through cyclic fatigue.

Where it matters for labs, clinics and supply decisions

  • Specification by manufacturer documents. Because EKS is 510(k) exempt, a 510(k) clearance record is not the comparison document for this device type. The product classification entry, the manufacturer’s instructions for use and the standards the manufacturer declares are the documents to compare.
  • Alloy is a documented specification. The AAE source notes that NiTi files can separate without any sign of fatigue, so alloy is a detail worth recording. Handling and inspection rules belong in the manufacturer’s instructions for use, which this page does not replace.
  • Related consumables. Canal irrigation is a separate topic; see dental irrigation syringes. Handpieces are covered in dental handpiece types.

Common misunderstandings

“All endodontic files are the same.”

They are not. Taper, cross-section, pitch and alloy treatment all vary, and the AAE counts roughly 150 to 200 types.

“A Class I, 510(k)-exempt file has been tested by the FDA.”

Exempt means no premarket notification is required for the device type when the regulation’s conditions are met. It is not an FDA performance endorsement of a specific product.

“A better file guarantees a better result.”

The 2025 AAE article states: “it is the clinician—not the files themselves—who ultimately performs the treatment.”

FAQ

What is an endodontic file?

It is a dental hand instrument classified by the FDA as “File, pulp canal, endodontic” (product code EKS) under 21 CFR 872.4565.

What are the parts of an endodontic file?

The AAE article describes files by design features rather than named anatomical parts: thickness and taper, cross-section, pitch (the distance between two consecutive cutting edges seen from the side) and alloy treatment.

What class of device is an endodontic file?

Class I (general controls), exempt from 510(k) premarket notification under the conditions in 21 CFR 872.4565 and 872.9.

Which standards does the FDA recognize for root canal files?

The FDA database lists ANSI/ADA Standard No. 58-2010 (R2015) for Type H (Hedstrom) root canal files and ISO 21850-1:2020 for stainless steel in dental instruments.

How often do endodontic instruments fracture?

The AAE reports a range of 0.7% to 6% of cases (2020 article). The figure is a reported range, not a rate for any product.

Sources

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Endodontic File: What It Is, Parts, Types and FDA Class

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →