Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthMedical & Research SuppliesReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us
GuideLaboratory Operations

Also relevant to: Energy & Renewables

Hydrogen Embrittlement: What It Is and How It Happens

Hydrogen embrittlement explained: affected metals, four sourced mechanisms compared, and DOE findings on hydrogen in steel pipelines.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Hydrogen embrittlement is the loss of toughness and ductility in a metal that has taken up hydrogen, so that it cracks or fractures at stresses it would otherwise tolerate. It is documented most heavily in steels, nickel alloys and titanium alloys, and in some metals (zirconium, niobium, vanadium, tantalum) it involves brittle hydride phases.

Short answer

Hydrogen embrittlement is cracking or fracture of a metal caused by dissolved hydrogen together with stress. It matters to engineers, lab staff and facilities teams wherever hydrogen is produced, stored or piped, or wherever steel parts are exposed to hydrogen-generating processes. The mechanism is not a single settled process: published reviews describe several, and combinations are likely.

Definition and scope

S.P. Lynch’s review for NACE Corrosion 2007 (Paper 07493, hosted by the US pipeline safety regulator’s R&D site) treats hydrogen embrittlement (HE) as a family of failure modes, especially in steels, nickel alloys and titanium alloys. The same review notes that the mechanisms operating in HE and in liquid-metal embrittlement are the same in steels, and it traces the history back to W.H. Johnson’s 1874 paper on changes in iron and steel produced by hydrogen and acids.

This page is a concept explainer. It does not give procedures, bake schedules or acceptance limits, which belong to the governing standard, the part specification and the material supplier.

How hydrogen embrittlement is described in practice

Reviews and engineering programmes describe the problem by where the hydrogen comes from and which materials are exposed. Two named sources show the range.

Mechanism research (Lynch, 2007)

The review distinguishes a hydride mechanism from three mechanisms that do not need hydrides, and concludes that the dominant process depends on the fracture mode.

Gaseous hydrogen infrastructure (US DOE, 2023)

M. Kass and colleagues at Oak Ridge National Laboratory presented a compatibility assessment at the DOE Hydrogen Program 2023 Annual Merit Review (7 June 2023). It states that hydrogen embrittlement of pipeline steels “has been extensively studied”, and that the US natural gas transmission network (over 300,000 miles, about 1,800 compressor stations, pipe up to 1.2 m / 48 in. diameter) is composed almost entirely of low-carbon steels. The presentation asks whether that existing infrastructure can be repurposed for hydrogen and for gas blends, and notes that much less is known about polymers than about steels.

Mechanisms compared

The table is limited to what Lynch (2007) states.

Mechanism Idea in brief Where the review says it applies
Hydride formation Brittle hydrides form ahead of the crack tip Widely accepted for Zr, Nb, V and Ta (first proposed by Westlake, 1969)
HELP (hydrogen-enhanced localised plasticity) Hydrogen promotes localised plastic deformation Slip-band fractures
HEDE (hydrogen-enhanced decohesion) Hydrogen weakens atomic bonds Possibly some brittle intergranular fracture
AIDE (adsorption-induced dislocation emission) Adsorbed hydrogen eases dislocation emission at the crack tip Cleavage-like and dimpled intergranular fracture

The review adds that combinations of these mechanisms are likely in many cases. It also records the historical lineage of the decohesion idea (Pfeil, 1926; Troiano, 1960) and of localised plasticity (Beachem, 1972).

Where it matters for labs, clinics and supply decisions

  • Hydrogen pipelines and repurposed gas lines. The DOE presentation reports that ASME B31.12 recommends a maximum steel grade of X52, and that API guidelines call for a maximum yield strength of 827 MPa. It also summarises studies suggesting natural gas blends with up to 17% hydrogen are suitable for existing pipelines. That figure is the project’s own summary of studies, not a guarantee for any specific line.
  • Material selection in lab equipment. Where hydrogen generators, gas manifolds, high-pressure fittings or electrolysis cells are specified, material compatibility with hydrogen is a question for the manufacturer’s documentation and the applicable code, not for general knowledge. For general material-compatibility thinking see CASRAI’s guides on 316 stainless steel and the chemical resistance chart for plastics.

Common misunderstandings

  • “There is one agreed mechanism.” The literature describes hydride, HELP, HEDE and AIDE processes, and combinations are likely.
  • “It only affects steel.” Lynch’s review covers nickel and titanium alloys and describes hydride-forming behaviour in Zr, Nb, V and Ta.
  • “A blend percentage is a safe-for-all figure.” The 17% finding is a summary of studies for natural gas pipeline steels, not a design allowance.

FAQ

What causes hydrogen embrittlement?

Hydrogen taken up by a susceptible metal, combined with stress, leads to cracking. Lynch’s review describes the processes by which the hydrogen produces fracture.

Which metals are affected?

The review focuses on steels, nickel alloys and titanium alloys, and describes hydride formation in zirconium, niobium, vanadium and tantalum.

Can existing natural gas pipelines carry hydrogen?

The DOE project cited above evaluates this question; it reports studies suggesting blends up to 17% hydrogen are suitable and recommends limits on steel grade (X52) and yield strength (827 MPa) under ASME B31.12 and API guidance. Specific decisions rest with the operator and applicable codes.

Sources

  • S.P. Lynch, “Progress towards understanding mechanisms of hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking”, NACE Corrosion 2007, Paper 07493: PHMSA R&D copy (read 2026-11-08).
  • M. Kass et al., “Compatibility Assessment of Natural Gas Pipeline Infrastructure Materials with Hydrogen, CO2, and Ammonia”, DOE Hydrogen Program 2023 Annual Merit Review, 7 June 2023: DOE presentation (read 2026-11-08).

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Hydrogen Embrittlement: What It Is and How It Happens

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →