Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & Research SupplyReagents, PPE & instruments — chain-of-custody documented.Fast, traceable sourcing built for regulated research environments, from bench consumables to instrumentation.Shop lac.us CodeCASRAIlac.us

Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF): Research Funding, Programmes and How It Differs From HEC

The Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) is Pakistan’s national science-funding body under the Ministry of Science and Technology, distinct from HEC. This guide covers what PSF funds, its main programmes, the application and evaluation process, reporting obligations, and where PSF and HEC funding overlap.

Ask about Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF): Research Funding, Programmes and How It Differs From HEC

Answers are drawn from this guide and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.

Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this

The Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) is Pakistan’s national apex body for financing and promoting scientific research, established under the Pakistan Science Foundation Act, 1973, and operating under the federal Ministry of Science and Technology. For a research administrator working with a Pakistani co-investigator, PSF is easy to confuse with the Higher Education Commission (HEC) — Pakistan’s much larger university funder and accreditor — but the two are legally distinct bodies with different remits, different parent ministries, and different application channels. This guide explains what PSF funds, how its programmes are structured, how it differs from HEC, and what an awardee is generally expected to report.

Quick answer

  • PSF is a statutory body created under the PSF Act, 1973, sitting under Pakistan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (not the Ministry of Education/HEC’s higher-education apparatus).
  • PSF’s mandate centers on scientific research funding, science popularization, and technology-industry linkages — it is not a university accreditor, degree-attestation body, or higher-education regulator.
  • Its work is organized across a small number of core programme areas: Research Support (project grants and fellowships), International Liaison (bilateral/multilateral collaborative research), Natural Science Linkages, the R&D Industry Programme (technology transfer between research institutions and industry), and Science Popularization (science clubs, museums, planetaria, and public-awareness initiatives).
  • PSF and HEC both fund research inside Pakistan, but from different mandates: HEC’s competitive schemes (like NRPU) are tied to its role funding and accrediting universities, while PSF’s grants are open more broadly to scientists and institutions engaged in scientific research and development, including outside the university system in some programme lines.
  • Programme names, funding ceilings, and open calls change across cycles — this guide reflects PSF’s structure as documented on its own site and recent public calls as of mid-2026; always confirm current scheme names and deadlines against psf.gov.pk and its grants-management portal before advising an applicant.

What the Pakistan Science Foundation is

PSF was established under the Pakistan Science Foundation Act, 1973, as Pakistan’s national foundation for the promotion, coordination, and financing of scientific research. It reports through the Ministry of Science and Technology, which places it in a different part of the federal government from the Higher Education Commission, which is an independent statutory commission with its own ordinance-based legal footing and a mandate that combines research funding with university accreditation and degree attestation. Where HEC’s identity is bound up with the higher-education system it also regulates, PSF’s identity is bound up with the broader national science-and-technology policy apparatus — it sits alongside (and periodically partners with) other Ministry of Science and Technology bodies rather than functioning as a university regulator itself.

PSF describes its own functions across a small set of programme areas rather than a single flagship scheme, reflecting its broader mandate: research funding, international scientific collaboration, links between research institutions, technology transfer to industry, and public science communication all sit inside the same organization.

What PSF funds: main programmes and schemes

Based on PSF’s own published organizational structure, its work runs through the following core programme areas. Treat the specific scheme names and eligibility rules within each as subject to change between funding cycles — PSF, like most national funders, periodically renames or restructures individual calls even where the underlying programme area is stable.

  • Research Support Programme — PSF’s core research-funding function, covering competitive research project grants and researcher fellowships. This is the programme area most directly comparable to a “research council” grant line, and the one most relevant to a researcher asking “can I apply to PSF for my project.” Public calls in recent cycles have included competitive research grants (commonly cited figures for individual awards have run up to roughly PKR 10 million, though ceilings are revised across calls) and targeted calls such as an “Industrial Solution Grants for Young Scientists” line aimed at early-career researchers working on applied, industry-facing problems.
  • International Liaison Programme — manages PSF’s role in bilateral and multilateral collaborative research, including joint research calls with partner-country science agencies. PSF has run joint programmes with China’s National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and, in some cycles, arrangements involving Japan’s JSPS, funding collaborative Pakistan–partner-country research projects rather than single-country awards.
  • Natural Science Linkages — supports connections between scientific institutions, learned societies, and researchers within Pakistan’s science ecosystem.
  • R&D Industry Programme — oriented toward technology transfer and translating research outputs toward industrial application, PSF’s rough counterpart to the applied/commercialization-facing schemes that other national funders (such as HEC’s Technology Development Fund) run separately.
  • Science Popularization Programme — supports science clubs, science museums, planetaria, and public science-awareness activity. This programme area has no direct HEC equivalent and reflects PSF’s broader public-science-communication mandate, distinct from competitive research funding.

PSF also periodically issues travel-grant support for researchers presenting at international conferences, administered separately from its core project-grant lines. Because PSF, like most national funders, revises specific scheme names, budget ceilings, and call windows across cycles, confirm the current list of open calls directly on PSF’s site (and its grants-management portal) rather than relying on any single summary as a permanent list.

How PSF differs from HEC — and where a researcher could apply to either

The distinction that matters most in practice: HEC funds research primarily as an extension of its role funding and regulating Pakistan’s university system, so its major competitive schemes (NRPU, IRSIP, TDF) are structured around university faculty and PhD scholars at HEC-recognized degree-awarding institutions. PSF funds research as a national science-foundation function under the Ministry of Science and Technology, with a mandate that is not tied to accrediting or funding universities as institutions — its Research Support and R&D Industry programmes are open to scientists and research institutions engaged in scientific research more broadly, which in practice can include university-based researchers alongside researchers at other public-sector research organizations.

For a university-based Pakistani researcher, this means genuine overlap exists: a faculty member at an HEC-recognized university doing applied science or technology-transfer-oriented research could, depending on the specific call, be eligible for both an HEC scheme (such as NRPU or TDF) and a PSF scheme (such as a Research Support Programme project grant or an R&D Industry Programme call) in the same funding cycle. PSF and HEC are separate funders with separate application portals and separate budgets — there is no single combined application, and an award from one does not substitute for eligibility requirements at the other. A research office advising a Pakistani co-investigator should check both funders’ current open calls rather than assuming only one applies, and should confirm with the applicant’s own institution whether either funder’s rules restrict concurrent funding for the same project scope.

Where the two clearly do not overlap: PSF has no role in university accreditation or degree attestation (an HEC-specific function), and HEC’s core competitive university schemes are not typically open to non-university public-sector research institutes in the way some PSF programme lines are.

Application and evaluation process

PSF’s grant calls are generally organized around specific programme lines (for example, a Research Support Programme call or an R&D Industry Programme call) rather than a single rolling application. Some funding categories are described as continuously open for proposals, while others are call-based — tied to a specific announced window, sometimes organized around a thematic priority (such as an emerging area like climate-related research) or an international-collaboration call with a named partner-country agency. PSF operates a grants-management portal for at least some of its programme lines, through which applicants submit proposals for review.

As with most national research foundations, PSF’s evaluation process for competitive schemes generally involves an internal or panel-based technical review of the proposal against programme criteria before a funding decision is issued, though PSF’s own site does not publish a single unified description of evaluation criteria across all of its programme lines — a specific call’s own guidelines are the authoritative source for how that call is reviewed. Applicants and research offices should treat the exact review process, required forms, and internal institutional sign-off (where a Pakistani institution requires one before submission) as specific to the individual call notice rather than standardized across every PSF programme.

Reporting obligations for awardees

PSF, like other national research funders, generally expects awardees to submit progress and completion reporting tied to the funded project’s milestones and its grant agreement terms; the specific reporting schedule, format, and any financial-utilization reporting requirement are set out in the individual award’s own terms and conditions rather than in a single public policy document covering every programme. A research office managing a PSF award for a Pakistani co-investigator or partner institution should request the specific award letter and grant agreement rather than assume reporting terms are uniform across PSF’s different programme lines — this is consistent with how most national science foundations structure post-award reporting, but PSF’s own current award-management documentation is the authoritative source for a specific grant.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Pakistan Science Foundation the same as Pakistan’s HEC?

No. PSF and HEC are separate statutory bodies. PSF operates under the Ministry of Science and Technology and funds scientific research, science popularization, and technology-industry linkages under the PSF Act, 1973. HEC is an independent statutory commission that both funds university research (through schemes like NRPU) and separately accredits universities and attests degrees. See CASRAI’s guide to HEC for its specific mandate and programmes.

Can a Pakistani university researcher apply to both PSF and HEC?

Potentially yes, depending on the specific calls open at the time — the two funders have separate budgets, separate application portals, and no combined application process. A researcher whose work fits both an HEC scheme (such as NRPU or TDF) and a PSF scheme (such as a Research Support Programme or R&D Industry Programme call) should check both funders’ current eligibility rules and their own institution’s policy on concurrent funding for overlapping project scope, rather than assuming one funder’s award disqualifies an application to the other.

Can a researcher outside Pakistan apply directly to PSF?

PSF’s core competitive research grant lines are generally structured for Pakistan-based researchers and institutions. International engagement with PSF is most commonly structured through its International Liaison Programme, which runs joint/bilateral research calls with partner-country funding agencies (PSF has run joint calls with China’s NSFC, for example) — these are collaborative-project mechanisms rather than a route for an international researcher to apply to PSF independently of a Pakistani partner.

What is the legal basis for PSF, and when was it established?

PSF was established under the Pakistan Science Foundation Act, 1973, giving it a statutory basis distinct from HEC’s separate 2002 founding ordinance/act. Both bodies are creations of federal legislation, but under different parent ministries and with materially different mandates.

Does PSF fund non-university research institutions?

PSF’s Research Support and R&D Industry programme lines are, in principle, broader than a university-only funder — PSF’s mandate as a national science foundation is not tied to accrediting or exclusively funding universities the way HEC’s is. In practice, eligibility for any specific PSF call still depends on that call’s own published criteria, which should be checked directly rather than assumed from the general programme description.

For the broader landscape of national and multilateral research funders outside the US federal system, see CASRAI’s guides to Pakistan’s HEC, Nigeria’s TETFund, and Nepal’s NAST.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →