Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Editorial · CASRAI · Research-information systems and integration

NVA Replaces Cristin: What Changed for Norway’s National Research-Information System

Norway retired Cristin during 2025 in favor of NVA (Nasjonalt vitenarkiv, the Norwegian Research Information Repository), a single national system operated by Sikt that also absorbed 60-plus institutional repositories, including BORA. Here is what changed for researchers and administrators.

Published 24 Jul 2026· 5 minute read

Norway’s national system for registering publications, projects, and other research outputs changed hands and technology in 2025. Cristin (Current Research Information System In Norway), the country’s long-standing national CRIS, has been retired and replaced by NVA — Nasjonalt vitenarkiv, the Norwegian Research Information Repository — a new national system built and operated by Sikt, the Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research.

What NVA is, and what it replaced

NVA is described by its operator as a national common service for registering, reporting, and making research outputs — publications, projects, and related activities — open and discoverable. It does not simply take over Cristin’s function; it consolidates two previously separate layers of Norwegian research infrastructure into one:

  • Cristin, the shared national registration and reporting system used across Norwegian universities, university colleges, health trusts, and research institutes since the mid-2000s, historically developed and hosted with the University of Oslo’s IT department playing a lead operational role.
  • More than 60 separate institutional open-access repositories (reported as 67-plus, including the University of Bergen’s BORA), which previously ran as distinct systems alongside Cristin rather than as part of it.

According to Sikt and euroCRIS, NVA folds both layers into a single platform, with the explicit goal of reducing duplicate data entry, improving metadata quality, and giving publicly funded Norwegian research one consistent point of national visibility instead of a Cristin record plus a separate, institution-specific repository record.

Timeline: a phased, multi-institution transition through 2025

Sikt reports that NVA followed roughly seven years of planning, design, testing, and cross-institutional collaboration before going live. The transition itself was staged rather than a single cutover date for every institution simultaneously:

  • During 2025, institutions moved onto NVA in stages — guidance published by individual universities (for example the University of Bergen, in coordination with its library) pointed to Cristin and BORA closing to new entries around mid-2025, with content transferred into NVA and existing academic staff automatically carrying over their editing rights via Feide or ID-porten login.
  • euroCRIS reports a national production launch on 1 October 2025, with roughly 170 institutions in production and migrated data searchable at that point.

Because individual institutions rolled over on their own internal timelines within that same year, the exact date any single university’s records moved from Cristin to NVA varies — research administrators working with a specific Norwegian institution should confirm that institution’s own transition date rather than assuming a single nationwide switch-over moment.

Why the change happened

Two reasons are consistently cited in institutional communications about the move. First, a technical one: Cristin’s underlying technology was described internally (including by the University of Oslo unit that had operated it) as outdated and due for replacement rather than incremental patching. Second, a structural one: research output metadata in Norway had been split across Cristin and dozens of independent institutional repositories, which meant duplicate entry for researchers and inconsistent, harder-to-aggregate metadata at the national level. Consolidating both into one Sikt-operated national system was framed as the fix for both problems at once.

What changed administratively

  • Operator. Sikt now develops and operates the national system; institutions that previously relied on the University of Oslo’s operational role for Cristin, or ran their own separate repository infrastructure, no longer do either.
  • Single registration point. New publications and results are registered directly in NVA going forward, rather than in Cristin plus a separate institutional repository.
  • Reporting continuity. National result reporting for the Norwegian Publication Indicator (Norway’s channel-based publication-counting system, historically run through Cristin) is reported to continue through NVA, with institutional guidance stressing that documentation and reporting obligations are unchanged even though the underlying system is new.
  • Persistent links. Institutions communicating the transition (e.g. the University of Bergen) indicated that existing permanent links into the old BORA repository were expected to keep resolving after closure, with content carried over into NVA — researchers relying on old repository URLs in CVs or funder reports should still confirm this for their specific institution rather than assume it universally.

Why this matters beyond Norway

NVA is a concrete, national-scale example of a pattern research-information professionals are watching across Europe: consolidating a national current research information system (CRIS) and a fragmented layer of institutional repositories into a single, persistent-identifier-driven national infrastructure, rather than running the two in parallel. It is directly relevant to the interoperability work coordinated internationally through euroCRIS, whose CERIF data model and OpenAIRE-aligned metadata practices sit behind how national systems like NVA exchange researcher, organization, and output records with each other and with international infrastructure. For CRIS managers and research administrators elsewhere, Norway’s transition is a real case study in the operational tradeoffs of consolidation: fewer systems to maintain and reconcile, against the real migration risk and short-term support burden of retiring a system institutions and researchers had used for roughly two decades.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cristin still in use?

No — Cristin has been retired as the national registration and reporting system and replaced by NVA, which Sikt now operates. Historical Cristin data was migrated into NVA rather than left orphaned.

What does NVA stand for?

NVA stands for Nasjonalt vitenarkiv, Norwegian for “National Research Archive” — commonly rendered in English as the Norwegian Research Information Repository.

Who operates NVA?

Sikt — the Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (Direktoratet for IKT og fellestjenester i høyere utdanning og forskning) — develops and operates NVA on behalf of Norwegian research institutions.

Does NVA replace institutional repositories too, or just Cristin?

Both. NVA was designed to absorb the national CRIS function previously performed by Cristin and to replace more than 60 separate institutional open-access repositories (such as the University of Bergen’s BORA), consolidating research-output registration and open-access deposit into one national system.

Do researchers need to re-register their publications in NVA?

Institutional guidance indicates existing Cristin content was migrated into NVA rather than requiring manual re-entry, and staff who had editing access in Cristin generally retained equivalent access in NVA. Going forward, new publications and results are registered directly in NVA. Researchers should check their specific institution’s library or research-support guidance for any institution-specific steps.

This page summarizes publicly available information from Sikt, euroCRIS, and Norwegian university communications as of publication. Institution-specific transition dates and procedural details vary; confirm current specifics with your own institution’s library or research-support office and with Sikt/NVA directly for anything operationally load-bearing.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →