Skip to main content
v2026.11,986 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Editorial · CASRAI · Responsible research assessment

REF 2029 publishes final guidance and panel criteria

REF 2029 has published final submission guidance, shared panel criteria and SPRE templates ahead of the November 2028 deadline.

Published 15 Nov 2026· 4 minute read

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about this story

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

CASRAI is the reference for research administration — bookmark it for the next question.

The REF 2029 team published its final Guidance on Submissions and Panel Criteria and Working Methods on 11 November 2026, alongside the Strategy, People and Research Environment templates. UK universities now have the final submission requirements and assessment criteria for preparing their returns for November 2028.

What the final REF 2029 publication changes

The announcement brings together the requirements for institutional submissions, the criteria expert panels will apply, and the templates for evidencing research strategy and environment. The final overview says all guidance modules have now been formally finalised. It allows later supplements to clarify details, while stating that these will not require new data items.

This is a later milestone than CASRAI’s coverage of the December 2025 pause lifting and its August 2026 account of the SPRE framework. Those reports provide dated background; the November publication supplies the final criteria and templates that were then outstanding.

For research offices, the documents connect to different preparation decisions. The planning implications below are an editorial interpretation of their respective roles.

Final document What it establishes Planning implication
Guidance on Submissions, Sections 1 and 2 Required submission information, processes and timetable. Align institutional data collection and exception planning with the specified requirements.
Panel Criteria, introduction and Annex A Combined criteria, disciplinary supplements and quality definitions. Check internal assessment rubrics against both the shared and relevant supplementary criteria.
SPRE guidance and assessment criteria Institution- and unit-level statements, narrative structure and evidence expectations. Assign responsibility for institutional strategy and unit implementation evidence separately.

Shared quality definitions retain disciplinary detail

For the first time, the four main panels have agreed shared criteria and quality definitions. The REF announcement presents this as greater consistency in language and interpretation across disciplines, while retaining the quality expected at each starred level.

The panel introduction makes clear that subject-specific supplementary criteria still matter: they accompany the combined statement rather than replace it. Universities preparing submissions across several subject areas therefore need both layers.

Annex A identifies different assessment dimensions for each element: research outputs under Contribution to Knowledge and Understanding are judged for originality, significance and rigour; impact case studies for reach and significance; and SPRE for vitality and sustainability. Its notes also distinguish quality standards from geographical scope. Research focused on one part of the UK can reach the highest quality level, and an impact’s reach is not simply its geographical spread.

SPRE templates confirm two statements and word limits

The final Strategy, People and Research Environment (SPRE) guidance includes institution-level and unit-level templates with downloadable Word documents. The funding bodies have rejected the proposed combined template for institutions submitting to just one Unit of Assessment. These institutions must also complete both statements, assessed separately.

Each statement permits up to 2,000 words for unscored context, plus up to 8,000 words distributed across four scored sections: strategy; people; income, infrastructure and facilities; and collaboration, engagement and impact. These are upper limits, not writing targets. The unit-level context includes a Statement of Representation and a Statement on the Research Community.

The panel criteria distinguish institutional strategy from its implementation within units. They recognise that some overlap may be appropriate, particularly in smaller institutions, and say there is no penalty for necessary duplication between statements.

Another distinction matters for evidence collection: suggested indicators are illustrative, but evidence of effectiveness or learning is required for each scored section. Institutions can select relevant qualitative or quantitative evidence rather than reproduce every suggested indicator. For research offices, this points to organising evidence around the narrative claims each statement needs to substantiate.

Submission deadline and system rollout are separate milestones

The final overview gives the submission deadline as noon on 24 November 2028, with assessment during 2029 and results publication in December 2029. The final guidance publication does not mean every operational component is already available.

Section 2 describes a phased Submission system: special-request functionality is planned from late 2026, with additional features during 2027 and full functionality by the end of 2027. It also says a test version will be made available to institutions and Current Research Information System providers. These are planned releases, rather than confirmation that the complete system has launched.

For requests to make multiple submissions, obtain small-unit exceptions or arrange assessment of security-classified material, the guidance provides rounds in March, June and October 2027. Other request types have different deadlines. Detailed verification and audit arrangements are due in spring 2027.

The practical consequence is that research offices can use the final documents for submission design now, while maintaining separate milestones for special requests, software testing and the later audit guidance.

Sources

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →