Skip to main content
v2026.11,986 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Editorial · CASRAI · AI and ML research outputs

Tomorrow Together announces AI voter-research initiative

Tomorrow Together announced a US$1.1 million political research effort on voters and AI ahead of the 2028 election.

Published 15 Nov 2026· 2 minute read

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about this story

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

CASRAI is the reference for research administration — bookmark it for the next question.

Tomorrow Together announced an initiative on 13 November 2026 to research how to communicate with voters about artificial intelligence, initially budgeted at US$1.1 million, according to the Associated Press. The Democratic political organization is looking ahead to the 2028 election.

What Tomorrow Together announced

AP reporter Nicholas Riccardi described the initiative as Democrats gathered for the What’s Next conference in Denver. Maddie Kriger, the group’s chief program officer, linked the work to winning votes and preparing to respond to possible future AI incidents.

For university research offices, the immediate relevance is monitoring the AI policy debate. The reported amount concerns political voter research rather than university science funding. An announcement of this kind is distinct from evidence about which messages work or what voters think.

Why the methods behind future findings matter

Any subsequent public findings would need methodological detail to support independent assessment. The American Association for Public Opinion Research’s disclosure standards identify the sponsor, research provider, population, recruitment, data-collection modes and field dates among the information to report. These are useful reference points for researchers evaluating survey research methods in a politically sponsored project.

The same standards call for the wording of measurement instruments, including the research questionnaire, as well as sample sizes, weighting and quality controls. AAPOR’s Transparency Initiative encourages disclosure while explicitly separating that commitment from a judgment about methodological quality. For universities citing future results, research transparency would make the evidence easier to inspect; it would not by itself establish validity.

A separate methodological question is whether AI is used within a study. AAPOR’s report on responsible AI integration in survey research addresses uses across the research process and related transparency and ethical considerations. Research about voters’ views of AI and research conducted using AI should be described separately.

Sources

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →