Direct comparison
bioRxiv vs. medRxiv Compared
bioRxiv (life sciences, 2013) vs. medRxiv (clinical/health research, 2019, ICMJE-aligned screening, no case reports) -- both now run by openRxiv.
Ask about bioRxiv vs. medRxiv Compared
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do bioRxiv, medRxiv compare side by side?
The table below compares bioRxiv, medRxiv across 14 procurement-relevant dimensions, from scope through links forward to journal version.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | bioRxiv | medRxiv |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Life sciences: molecular biology, genetics, neuroscience, ecology, and related basic/preclinical research | Clinical and health research: trials, epidemiology, cohort studies, public-health research |
| Launched | November 2013 | June 2019 |
| Founded/managed by | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) | CSHL, Yale University School of Medicine, and BMJ |
| Current operator | openRxiv (independent non-profit, since March 11, 2025) | openRxiv (independent non-profit, since March 11, 2025) |
| Peer reviewed? | No -- basic screening only, explicitly labelled as such | No -- basic screening only, explicitly labelled as such |
| Screening rigor | Screens for offensive/non-scientific content, plagiarism, and biosecurity/dual-use risk | Goes further than bioRxiv: also screens for content that could endanger patient or public health |
| Case reports / case series | Not categorically excluded (subject to general scope) | Explicitly excluded |
| Other excluded content | Determined by basic scientific scope and screening criteria | Preclinical/veterinary studies, narrative reviews, editorials/opinion pieces, hypotheses without data, standalone guidelines/policy statements/protocols |
| Ethics/IRB documentation | Required where applicable to the study | Required: statement of oversight by an IRB, Ethics Committee, or equivalent for human-subjects research |
| Clinical trial registration | Not applicable to most bioRxiv content | Required: ICMJE-recognized trial registry ID for clinical trials |
| Causal-language guidance | No equivalent explicit guidance | Authors cautioned against causal language absent a robust causal-inference framework; may be declined |
| Licensing at submission | Author choice, including CC licences | Author choice, including CC licences |
| DOI assigned | Yes, with versioned revisions | Yes, with versioned revisions |
| Links forward to journal version | Yes, where the paper is subsequently published | Yes, where the paper is subsequently published |
Common questions
Common questions about bioRxiv vs medRxiv
Can the same manuscript be posted to both bioRxiv and medRxiv?
+
No -- a given manuscript belongs on one or the other based on its content. Basic/preclinical life-sciences work goes to bioRxiv; clinical and human-health research goes to medRxiv. Both servers' screening teams will redirect a manuscript submitted to the wrong one rather than simply rejecting it.
Why does medRxiv exclude case reports?
+
Case reports carry a higher risk of being misread as clinical guidance from a single, unreplicated observation. medRxiv's screening standard specifically weighs public-harm risk, which bioRxiv's broader life-sciences scope does not need to weigh the same way.
Are bioRxiv and medRxiv still run by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory?
+
Not directly as of March 11, 2025. Both are now operated by openRxiv, an independent non-profit created specifically to run them; CSHL and, for medRxiv, Yale and BMJ remain part of the platforms' history and governance lineage.
Does posting on medRxiv prevent later journal publication?
+
No. Most journals that accept preprints treat medRxiv postings the same as bioRxiv postings -- posting first does not preclude submitting to a journal afterward, and the preprint record links forward to the published version once one exists.
Going deeper
