Direct comparison
Arxiv Vs Biorxiv: Key Differences & Comparison | CASRAI
arXiv and bioRxiv are the two most prominent preprint servers in research, but they serve different disciplines and operate under different governance models. This comparison covers their histories, subject coverage, version control, and withdrawal policies, and includes medRxiv as the health-sciences equivalent of bioRxiv.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | arXiv | bioRxiv |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991 (Paul Ginsparg, Los Alamos National Laboratory; moved to Cornell 2001; becoming independent nonprofit 2026) | 2013 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; moved to openRxiv nonprofit March 2025) |
| Primary subject coverage | Physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, electrical engineering, economics | Life sciences and biology; medRxiv (sister server) covers clinical medicine and public health |
| Operator / governance | Cornell University until 2026; becoming independent nonprofit (arXiv.org); member-supported via library consortium | openRxiv nonprofit (from March 2025), backed by Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; previously Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
| Peer review | None — preprints are screened by moderators for scope and basic quality, not peer-reviewed | None — preprints are screened but not peer-reviewed; clearly labelled as not peer-reviewed |
| Version control | Full versioning; all versions retained permanently; each version accessible via a URL; latest version displayed by default | Full versioning; all prior versions retained and publicly accessible; updated versions replace the displayed default |
| Withdrawal / removal | Removal of content is rare; withdrawn preprints retain their metadata and a withdrawal notice; content is not permanently deleted | Preprints withdrawn for policy violations retain a tombstone record; the same manuscript may not be submitted to both bioRxiv and medRxiv simultaneously |
| Commenting and community feedback | No native comment system on arXiv itself; third-party tools (Hypothesis, PubPeer) used by the community | Native commenting enabled on preprints; community annotations via Hypothesis also supported |
| Journal compatibility | Most physics, maths, and CS journals accept preprint submission; authors should verify target journal's policy | Most life science and medical journals accept preprint submission; Nature, Science, Cell, BMJ have explicit preprint-friendly policies |
| Submission format | LaTeX preferred in physics and maths; PDF and Word also accepted depending on category | PDF, Word, or LaTeX; bioRxiv also supports multimedia and data supplements |
Common questions
FAQ
Can I submit the same preprint to both bioRxiv and medRxiv?+
No. bioRxiv and medRxiv have an explicit rule against simultaneous submission of identical work. Submitting to both will result in one submission being withdrawn. For research that spans biology and clinical medicine, choose the more appropriate server based on the primary audience and subject matter.
Does posting to arXiv or bioRxiv prevent journal publication?+
In almost all cases, no. The overwhelming majority of journals in the relevant disciplines — including Nature, Science, The Lancet, and all major physics and mathematics journals — accept submissions that have been posted as preprints. Authors should verify the specific policy of their target journal, but preprint-friendly policies are now the norm.
Are preprints from arXiv and bioRxiv citable?+
Yes. Both servers assign persistent identifiers — arXiv assigns an arXiv ID, bioRxiv assigns a DOI. Preprints can be cited in reference lists and should be clearly labelled as preprints to distinguish them from peer-reviewed publications. Once a preprint is published in a journal, update citations to the published version.
Going deeper
