Direct comparison
arXiv vs. bioRxiv: Which Preprint Server to Use
arXiv (physics/math/CS, since 1991) has lighter screening; bioRxiv (biology, since 2013) screens harder for biomedical risk. Scope and governance compared.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · free to try
Ask about arXiv vs. bioRxiv: Which Preprint Server to Use
Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.
An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.
Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do arXiv, bioRxiv compare side by side?
The table below compares arXiv, bioRxiv across 9 procurement-relevant dimensions, from founded through cost to author.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | arXiv | bioRxiv |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991, by physicist Paul Ginsparg | 2013, by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) |
| Subject scope | Physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, EE/systems science, economics (8 subject areas) | Biology only (molecular biology, genetics, genomics, neuroscience, ecology, evolutionary biology); clinical/health work goes to sister server medRxiv |
| Operated by | arXiv, Inc., an independent nonprofit since July 1, 2026 (previously hosted by Cornell University; still based at Cornell Tech) | openRxiv, an independent non-profit since March 11, 2025 (previously operated directly by CSHL) |
| Pre-posting screening | Category moderators (working scientists); first-time submitters to a category generally need endorsement from an existing author in that category | Working-scientist moderators screen for plagiarism, non-scientific content, and biosecurity/dual-use or health-risk concerns; no endorsement system |
| Peer reviewed? | No -- screening checks scope/appropriateness, not correctness | No -- screening checks scope/appropriateness and biosecurity risk, not correctness |
| Corpus size | 3M+ articles | Smaller, younger corpus; substantial preprint-adoption growth in biology since founding, accelerated by COVID-19 |
| Funding / governance | Board of Directors; funded by Simons Foundation, Schmidt Sciences, Cornell University, member institutions, donors | Governed by openRxiv, which also operates medRxiv |
| DOI assigned | Yes | Yes |
| Cost to author | Free | Free |
Common questions
Common questions about arXiv vs bioRxiv
Is arXiv or bioRxiv peer reviewed?
+
Neither. Both are preprint servers hosting non-peer-reviewed manuscript versions, screened for scope and scientific character (and, for bioRxiv, biosecurity/ethics risk) but not for correctness. Peer review happens afterward, if at all, at a journal the author separately submits to.
Do I need an endorsement to post to bioRxiv the way I do for arXiv?
+
No. bioRxiv does not use arXiv's endorsement system; it relies on its own moderator screening of each submission rather than requiring an existing author to vouch for a first-time submitter.
Can the same paper go on both arXiv and bioRxiv?
+
In practice authors choose the server matching their field rather than cross-posting the same manuscript to both, since each is scoped to a different subject area and funders/journals generally expect one canonical preprint record.
Who runs arXiv and bioRxiv now?
+
As of July 1, 2026, arXiv is operated by arXiv, Inc., an independent nonprofit that spun out of Cornell University. bioRxiv (and medRxiv) has been operated by the independent non-profit openRxiv since March 11, 2025, taking over from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
