Direct comparison
Competing vs. Noncompeting Renewal (NIH)
NIH Type 2 competing renewal needs full peer review; Type 5 noncompeting continuation just needs an annual RPPR. Here is the difference.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · free to try
Ask about Competing vs. Noncompeting Renewal (NIH)
Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.
An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.
Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do Competing Renewal (Type 2), Noncompeting Renewal / Continuation (Type 5) compare side by side?
The table below compares Competing Renewal (Type 2), Noncompeting Renewal / Continuation (Type 5) across 8 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it is through not to be confused with.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Competing Renewal (Type 2) | Noncompeting Renewal / Continuation (Type 5) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A new, fully competing application requesting support for a project period beyond the current one | The routine continuation of an already-awarded project into its next budget year, within the same already-competed project period |
| When it applies | The current competitive segment (project period) is ending and continued support is wanted | The current competitive segment has budget years remaining -- this is the normal annual step in most of those years |
| Peer review | Full scientific/technical merit review at a study section, developed as though applying for the first time | None -- administrative review of the progress report by program/grants management staff |
| Competes for funding | Yes -- competes against Type 1 applications and other Type 2 renewals in the same review cycle | No -- funding for the competitive segment was already committed, subject to appropriations and satisfactory progress |
| What is submitted | A full competing application: Specific Aims, Research Strategy (e.g. 12 pages for R01), budget justification, via the standard FOA/receipt date | A Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) via eRA Commons: progress narrative, personnel/participant updates, coming year's budget -- no Specific Aims or Research Strategy |
| Mechanism-dependent? | Yes -- renewal eligibility is set by the activity code; e.g. available for R01, not available for R21 | Applies whenever a competing award has more than one budget year -- not mechanism-restricted the way Type 2 is |
| Grant-number digit | Leading "2" (e.g. 2 R01 CA123456-06A1) | Leading "5" (e.g. 5 R01 CA123456-04) |
| Not to be confused with | A Type 5 noncompeting continuation, or a No-Cost Extension (neither involves competitive peer review) | A Type 3 administrative supplement (adds funds within the current budget period without a new RPPR cycle) or a competing Type 2 renewal |
Common questions
Common questions about Competing Renewal (Type 2) vs Noncompeting Renewal / Continuation (Type 5)
Does a noncompeting renewal require a new proposal?
+
No. A noncompeting continuation (Type 5) is supported by a Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) filed through eRA Commons -- a progress narrative and coming-year budget, not a new Specific Aims or Research Strategy, and not peer-reviewed.
Can NIH deny a noncompeting continuation?
+
NIH can withhold or reduce a noncompeting continuation if progress is judged insufficient or funds aren't available, but that is an administrative program decision, not a competitive peer-review decline the way a Type 2 competing renewal can be.
Which NIH activity codes have no competing renewal mechanism?
+
Renewal eligibility is set per activity code. R21 (Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant), for example, has no Type 2 competing renewal mechanism -- once its project period ends, the PI must submit a new Type 1 application rather than a renewal.
Where does the type code show up on an award?
+
As the leading digit of the NIH grant number, before the activity code -- for example the "2" in 2 R01 GM123456-06A1 (competing renewal) or the "5" in 5 R01 GM123456-04 (noncompeting continuation, fourth year).
