Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us

Direct comparison

Type 1 vs. Type 2 Grant (NIH) Explained

NIH Type 1 = new application. Type 2 = competing renewal, fully peer-reviewed. Learn the difference, which mechanisms allow renewal, and where it shows up.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionType 1 (New Application)Type 2 (Competing Renewal)
What it requestsSupport for a project not currently receiving NIH fundingAdditional support for a period beyond a current award's existing project period
Peer reviewFull scientific/technical merit review, standard study section processFull peer review required -- must be developed as though applying for the first time, not a formality
Competes for fundingYesYes -- competes against Type 1 and other applications in the same cycle
Prior-progress evidence expectedNot applicable (no prior NIH award on this project)Yes -- reviewers weigh progress, publications, and milestones from the current project period
Grant-number digitLeading "1" (e.g. 1 R01 CA123456-01)Leading "2" (e.g. 2 R01 CA123456-06A1)
Availability by mechanismAvailable for essentially all NIH activity codesMechanism-dependent -- e.g. available for R01, NOT available for R21 (no renewal mechanism)
Not to be confused withN/AType 5 (noncompeting continuation/RPPR) and No-Cost Extensions, neither of which involve competing peer review

Common questions

FAQ

Is a Type 2 the same as a No-Cost Extension?+

No. A No-Cost Extension keeps an existing project period going longer with no new funds and no new peer review. A Type 2 is a separate, fully competing application for an entirely new project period, peer-reviewed on its own merits.

Can any NIH activity code have a Type 2 renewal?+

No -- renewal eligibility is set by the activity code and sometimes the specific Funding Opportunity Announcement. R01 supports Type 2 competing renewal; R21 explicitly does not.

Does a Type 2 application need to be as detailed as a Type 1?+

Yes. NIH policy requires a competing renewal to be fully developed and peer-reviewed as though the applicant were applying for the first time.

Where does the Type code appear on an NIH award?+

As the leading digit of the NIH grant number, before the activity code -- for example the "1" in 1 R01 GM123456-01 or the "2" in 2 R01 GM123456-06A1.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →