Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A senior colleague who read three drafts and proposed restructuring the discussion, acknowledged by name with consent
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A casual 'looks good' email response is not pre-submission feedback in the creditable sense
Editorial commentary
Pre-submission feedback covers the spectrum from quick read-throughs to deep methodological critique. Where the feedback materially changed the work, named acknowledgement (with consent) is the standard credit; where it rose to substantive intellectual contribution to the work’s claims, authorship may be warranted.
References
- ICMJE Recommendations (2024)
- COPE Authorship Discussion Document (2019)
Also known as
Draft feedback · Pre-submission review
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Pre-submission feedback contribution"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pre-submission-feedback-contribution" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"name": "Pre-submission feedback contribution",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pre-submission-feedback-contribution",
"description": "Substantive intellectual input — comments, critique, suggested revisions, or methodological advice — provided by a colleague on a draft manuscript or proposal before it is submitted to a journal or funder, recognised in acknowledgements rather than as authorship.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/credit-extensions-and-adjacent-contribution-vocabularies/",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pre-submission-feedback-contribution",
"sameAs": [
"Draft feedback",
"Pre-submission review"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}







