Funder guidance · 15 funders · 15 CRediT statement guides
Funder guidance for authors
What each major research funder expects from you as an author: whether a CRediT contributor statement is required, recommended, encouraged or absent from policy text; the open-access and data-sharing rules attached to the award; the submission system and biosketch format; and how to word the statement itself. Grouped below by how firmly each funder's own policy text commits to CRediT.
CRediT status
Recommended (4)
Policy text recommends a CRediT statement on funded outputs.
CRediT status
Encouraged (8)
Guidance or programme calls reference CRediT, but formal policy text is silent.
ARC
AustraliaEncouraged
Australian Research Council
CIHR
CanadaEncouraged
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
ERC
European UnionEncouraged
European Research Council
Horizon Europe
European UnionEncouraged
Horizon Europe (EU Framework Programme)
MRC
United KingdomEncouraged
Medical Research Council
NHMRC
AustraliaEncouraged
National Health and Medical Research Council
NIH
United StatesEncouraged
National Institutes of Health
UKRI
United KingdomEncouraged
UK Research and Innovation
CRediT status
Silent (3)
No published funder stance on CRediT or contributor taxonomies.
Elsewhere on CASRAI
