Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Cut Resistant Glove Levels: ANSI/ISEA 105 A1-A9 Explained

What the ANSI/ISEA 105 cut levels A1-A9 mean in grams-force, how cut, puncture and abrasion ratings differ, and how to choose by hazard assessment.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

This page describes products and general use; it is not medical advice.

Cut-resistant glove levels run from A1 to A9 under ANSI/ISEA 105, and a higher number means the glove material needs more force to be cut through. The level describes one laboratory cut test. It does not describe puncture, abrasion, chemical or needlestick protection. Who uses it: workers and buyers in clinical, laboratory and supply settings whose hands are exposed to cuts or lacerations, the hazard category named in 29 CFR 1910.138.

What cut-resistant gloves are

Cut-resistant gloves are hand protection made or lined with materials that resist being cut by a sharp edge. Their purpose is to reduce the chance of cut and laceration injuries when hands handle blades, glass edges, sheet metal or other cutting hazards. The cut level printed on a glove, or on its packaging, is a rating from a standardized test, not a promise that the glove cannot be cut. MCR Safety, a glove manufacturer, states in its published guide that there is no such thing as cut-proof or puncture-proof gloves.

What the A1 to A9 levels mean

ANSI/ISEA 105 is the American hand protection classification standard published by the International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA). ISEA describes the cut rating as classified by the weight needed to cut through the material with 20 mm of blade travel. The levels are therefore expressed as a force in grams-force (gf). The thresholds below come from ISEA’s published key to hand classifications (November 2024).

Cut level Cut force threshold (gf)
A1 200
A2 500
A3 1,000
A4 1,500
A5 2,200
A6 3,000
A7 4,000
A8 5,000
A9 6,000

The 2024 edition of the standard adds marking requirements intended to standardize how key protective properties are shown on the product. Read the marking on the glove you are actually handling rather than relying on older packaging or a catalog description.

Ratings versus standards

ANSI/ISEA 105 is the US standard. MCR Safety notes that EN 388 is the standard used in Europe, so a glove sold internationally may carry a different rating system on its label. Treat the two as separate systems and read each label on its own terms.

Cut, puncture and abrasion are separate ratings

ISEA describes three distinct properties in its summary of the 2024 edition:

  • Cut: classified by the weight needed to cut through the material with 20 mm of blade travel.
  • Puncture: assessed by the force required to puncture the material with a sharp probe.
  • Abrasion: measured by the number of abrasion cycles the material can withstand before failure.

ISEA’s key lists puncture levels for a non-hypodermic probe. A hypodermic needle is a different hazard, so a puncture rating should not be read as needlestick protection.

Puncture level Force threshold (N), non-hypodermic probe
0 below 10
1 10 or more
2 20 or more
3 60 or more
4 100 or more

How to choose cut-resistant gloves

The only selection rule that comes from a regulator is a process, not a number. Under 29 CFR 1910.138(a), employers must select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when hands are exposed to hazards that include severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns and thermal burns. Under 1910.138(b), selection must be based on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, the conditions present, the duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified.

In practice that means:

Safe use and handling basics

  • Use the glove for the hazard it was assessed for, and replace it if it is cut, worn through or contaminated.
  • Do not treat any cut level as cut-proof; keep hands clear of the cutting edge.
  • Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use for fit, care and replacement.
  • Put on and remove gloves in the order your facility’s procedure requires; see PPE donning and doffing sequence and what lab PPE is.

For disposable examination and procedure gloves, see medical gloves.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming a higher level means broader protection. The level reflects one cut test only.
  • Reading a cut rating as sharps or needlestick protection. The puncture probe in the standard’s key is non-hypodermic; for sharps handling see sharps disposal regulations for laboratories.
  • Mixing up rating systems. ANSI/ISEA 105 levels (A1 to A9) and EN 388 markings are different systems.
  • Skipping the task assessment. 1910.138 ties selection to the task, conditions, duration and hazards, not to a single number.

FAQ

How do I choose cut-resistant gloves?

Start with a hazard evaluation of the task, as 29 CFR 1910.138(b) requires: the tasks, conditions, duration of use and identified hazards. Then compare the cut level (and the puncture and abrasion ratings) on the label with that evaluation, and check for any other hazard the same task involves.

What are cut-resistant gloves?

They are hand protection made with materials that resist cutting by a sharp edge, rated under ANSI/ISEA 105 on a scale from A1 to A9 based on the force needed to cut through the material.

What are cut-resistant glove ratings and standards?

In the US, ANSI/ISEA 105 sets the A1 to A9 cut classification, along with puncture and abrasion ratings. EN 388 is the standard used in Europe, per MCR Safety.

Sources

Follow CASRAI

Research-administration guidance, standards updates and independent tool reviews.

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Cut Resistant Glove Levels: ANSI/ISEA 105 A1-A9 Explained

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Ask CASRAI · Regulatory Radar

Research-admin question? Get an answer that links its sources.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. Every answer links its sources to check before you act. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.