Direct comparison
arXiv vs. OSF: Preprints Compared
arXiv is a subject-specific preprint server for physics, math, and CS. OSF covers preprints in any field, plus project and data management.
Ask about arXiv vs. OSF: Preprints Compared
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do arXiv, OSF compare side by side?
The table below compares arXiv, OSF across 9 procurement-relevant dimensions, from what it is through cost.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | arXiv | OSF |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Subject-specific preprint server | General-purpose, discipline-agnostic research platform (preprints + project management, data, and materials hosting) |
| Operated by | Independent nonprofit as of July 1, 2026 (25 years hosted by Cornell University before that; founded 1991 by Paul Ginsparg at Los Alamos) | Center for Open Science (COS), nonprofit founded January 2013 by Brian Nosek and Jeffrey Spies |
| Disciplinary scope | Physics, math, CS, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, EE/systems science, economics | Any discipline — generalist OSF Preprints server plus branded community servers (PsyArXiv, SocArXiv, engrXiv, EarthArXiv, and others) |
| Content model | One unified server and namespace | Aggregator + branded-server model; communities launch their own named preprint services on shared OSF infrastructure |
| Beyond preprints | Preprints only — no project-management or data-hosting layer | Also private project storage, version history, preregistration (OSF Registries), and third-party storage add-ons |
| Screening | Endorsement system plus subject-category moderator review for scope, format, and dual-use concerns | Baseline non-scholarly-content screening; thoroughness varies by branded server since each is community-operated |
| DOI registration | DataCite (automatic for new submissions since February 2022) | Crossref (on submission, for OSF Preprints and its branded servers) |
| Also indexes other servers | No | Yes — OSF Preprints' search aggregates metadata from external providers including arXiv |
| Cost | Free to submit and read | Free to submit and read |
Common questions
Common questions about arXiv vs OSF
Can I post the same paper to both arXiv and OSF Preprints?
+
Cross-posting norms vary by field and by the specific OSF branded server — check the target journal's preprint policy and the receiving server's own submission guidance before dual-posting, since some venues restrict simultaneous posting to multiple preprint servers.
Is OSF the same thing as "Open Science Foundation"?
+
No — that name doesn't exist as an organization. The platform is the Open Science Framework (OSF); it is built and run by the Center for Open Science (COS), a differently-named nonprofit. This is a common mix-up.
Does arXiv's spin-out from Cornell change how researchers submit or access papers?
+
As of the July 1, 2026 transition, arXiv and Cornell have described no user-facing changes — submission, access, and endorsement processes continue as before; the change is organizational and financial rather than functional.
Which one assigns a "real" DOI?
+
Both do. arXiv registers DOIs through DataCite; OSF Preprints and its branded servers register DOIs through Crossref. Either is a valid, resolvable, citable persistent identifier for the preprint version, distinct from the DOI the eventual peer-reviewed version of record will carry.
