arXiv Endorsement System

The arXiv endorsement system is the mechanism arXiv uses to confirm that a first-time submitter, or an existing author submitting to an arXiv subject category for the first time, is a legitimate participant in that field before their submission is accepted for processing. A submission is subject to endorsement whenever the submitting author has no prior accepted-and-announced papers in the specific endorsement domain they are submitting to. To satisfy the requirement, the author must be endorsed by an existing arXiv author (an 'endorser') who is themselves in good standing in that same endorsement domain, meaning the endorser has authored a sufficient number of papers in that domain within roughly the preceding five years (and at least three months old, so very recent authors cannot immediately endorse others). Endorsement confirms only that the submission is topically appropriate for the category and that the author appears to understand the field's basic conventions -- arXiv is explicit that endorsement 'is not peer review' and endorsers are not vouching for scientific correctness. Endorsement is separate from arXiv moderation, the ongoing process by which category moderators can reclassify, hold, or (rarely) reject content after submission on subject-matter or scope grounds.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board

· Last updated 18 Jul 2026

Worked examples

Is an instance

A graduate student with no prior arXiv submissions in astro-ph (astrophysics) asks their thesis advisor, who has published multiple astro-ph papers on arXiv over the past several years, to submit an endorsement on their behalf before their first paper in that category is accepted.

Is an instance

A computer scientist with an established arXiv history in cs.LG (machine learning) submits their first-ever paper in cs.CR (cryptography and security). Because cs.LG and cs.CR are separate endorsement domains, their existing standing in cs.LG does not exempt them -- they need a separate endorser active in cs.CR.

The arXiv endorsement system is a gatekeeping mechanism, distinct from peer review, that arXiv uses before accepting submissions from authors who have no prior track record in a given subject area. It exists to keep arXiv’s largely unmoderated, non-peer-reviewed preprint server usable as a serious scholarly communication channel, without requiring every submission to go through formal review before it appears.

When endorsement is required

Endorsement is triggered per endorsement domain, not per arXiv account. An author who has previously had a paper accepted and announced in a given domain is generally not asked to be endorsed again for further submissions in that same domain. A returning arXiv author submitting to a new subject area for the first time, however, is treated the same as a brand-new submitter for that area and must secure endorsement there. arXiv also extends automatic endorsement in some cases to authors submitting from a recognized institutional email domain, which can bypass the manual step.

Who can act as an endorser

An endorser must be an existing arXiv author who is themselves active and in good standing within the relevant endorsement domain — specifically, someone who has authored a sufficient number of papers in that domain within roughly the past five years, with a minimum three-month gap since their own qualifying submission. This threshold is calibrated so that, per arXiv’s own description, an active researcher who has worked in a field for a few years should generally be able to endorse others. An endorser is not required to have any personal relationship with the person they endorse, but is expected to know the submitter’s work well enough to judge that it is topically appropriate for the category and reflects basic familiarity with the field — not to certify that the results are correct.

Endorsement domains are category-specific

Endorsement is organized around endorsement domains, which broadly track arXiv’s top-level subject areas (for example physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology), with physics further subdivided into its own subject classes. Being endorsed, or eligible to endorse, in one domain carries no weight in another — an author with years of standing in mathematics cannot endorse a first-time submitter in a biology category, since the two are separate endorsement domains with independent eligibility.

Endorsement versus arXiv moderation

Endorsement and moderation are frequently confused because both function as quality gates around an otherwise open submission process, but they operate at different points and check different things. Endorsement is a pre-submission check tied to the author’s standing in a subject area. Moderation is an ongoing, post-submission process carried out by volunteer subject-area moderators, who can reclassify a paper into a more appropriate category, place it on hold for further review, or — rarely — decline it, generally on scope or appropriateness grounds rather than a judgment of scientific merit. A submission can clear endorsement and still be moderated afterward; the two processes are not substitutes for one another.

What happens without an endorser

A first-time submitter who cannot identify a qualifying endorser is not simply blocked — arXiv’s guidance directs them to seek out someone knowledgeable in the subject area of their submission, such as a thesis advisor, co-author, or colleague already active on arXiv in that domain. Submissions that require endorsement but do not have it are held rather than immediately rejected, giving the author a window to secure one.

Related terms

The endorsement system governs eligibility to submit to arXiv, which is the best-known example of a preprint server; see that entry for how preprints more generally relate to peer-reviewed publication.

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element

xml

<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="arXiv Endorsement System"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/arxiv-endorsement-system" />

Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)

json

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/arxiv-endorsement-system",
  "name": "arXiv Endorsement System",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/arxiv-endorsement-system",
  "description": "The arXiv endorsement system is the mechanism arXiv uses to confirm that a first-time submitter, or an existing author submitting to an arXiv subject category for the first time, is a legitimate participant in that field before their submission is accepted for processing. A submission is subject to endorsement whenever the submitting author has no prior accepted-and-announced papers in the specific endorsement domain they are submitting to. To satisfy the requirement, the author must be endorsed by an existing arXiv author (an 'endorser') who is themselves in good standing in that same endorsement domain, meaning the endorser has authored a sufficient number of papers in that domain within roughly the preceding five years (and at least three months old, so very recent authors cannot immediately endorse others). Endorsement confirms only that the submission is topically appropriate for the category and that the author appears to understand the field's basic conventions -- arXiv is explicit that endorsement 'is not peer review' and endorsers are not vouching for scientific correctness. Endorsement is separate from arXiv moderation, the ongoing process by which category moderators can reclassify, hold, or (rarely) reject content after submission on subject-matter or scope grounds.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/publishing#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/arxiv-endorsement-system",
  "sameAs": [],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "dateModified": "2026-07-18T11:50:26",
  "inLanguage": "en"
}