arXiv Endorsement: Who Can Endorse, How to Get One

The arXiv endorsement system is a gatekeeping mechanism, distinct from peer review, that arXiv uses before accepting submissions from authors who have no prior track record in a given subject area. It exists to keep arXiv’s largely unmoderated, non-peer-reviewed preprint server usable as a serious scholarly communication channel, without requiring every submission to go through formal review before it appears.

When endorsement is required

Endorsement is triggered per endorsement domain, not per arXiv account. An author who has previously had a paper accepted and announced in a given domain is generally not asked to be endorsed again for further submissions in that same domain. A returning arXiv author submitting to a new subject area for the first time, however, is treated the same as a brand-new submitter for that area and must secure endorsement there. arXiv also extends automatic endorsement in some cases to authors submitting from a recognized institutional email domain, which can bypass the manual step.

Who can act as an endorser

An endorser must be an existing arXiv author who is themselves active and in good standing within the relevant endorsement domain — specifically, someone who has authored a sufficient number of papers in that domain within roughly the past five years, with a minimum three-month gap since their own qualifying submission. This threshold is calibrated so that, per arXiv’s own description, an active researcher who has worked in a field for a few years should generally be able to endorse others. An endorser is not required to have any personal relationship with the person they endorse, but is expected to know the submitter’s work well enough to judge that it is topically appropriate for the category and reflects basic familiarity with the field — not to certify that the results are correct.

Endorsement domains are category-specific

Endorsement is organized around endorsement domains, which broadly track arXiv’s top-level subject areas (for example physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology), with physics further subdivided into its own subject classes. Being endorsed, or eligible to endorse, in one domain carries no weight in another — an author with years of standing in mathematics cannot endorse a first-time submitter in a biology category, since the two are separate endorsement domains with independent eligibility.

Endorsement versus arXiv moderation

Endorsement and moderation are frequently confused because both function as quality gates around an otherwise open submission process, but they operate at different points and check different things. Endorsement is a pre-submission check tied to the author’s standing in a subject area. Moderation is an ongoing, post-submission process carried out by volunteer subject-area moderators, who can reclassify a paper into a more appropriate category, place it on hold for further review, or — rarely — decline it, generally on scope or appropriateness grounds rather than a judgment of scientific merit. A submission can clear endorsement and still be moderated afterward; the two processes are not substitutes for one another.

What happens without an endorser

A first-time submitter who cannot identify a qualifying endorser is not simply blocked — arXiv’s guidance directs them to seek out someone knowledgeable in the subject area of their submission, such as a thesis advisor, co-author, or colleague already active on arXiv in that domain. Submissions that require endorsement but do not have it are held rather than immediately rejected, giving the author a window to secure one.

How to actually get endorsed

This is the part arXiv’s own documentation makes harder to follow than it needs to be. If you have been told you need an endorsement, here is the practical process, drawn from arXiv’s own help pages.

Do you actually need one?

You need an endorsement only if you are submitting to a specific arXiv category for the first time — either because you have never submitted to arXiv at all, or because you have submitted before but not in this particular endorsement domain. If you have already had a paper accepted and announced in a category, you do not need to be re-endorsed for further submissions there. Some first-time submitters skip the manual step entirely: arXiv can grant automatic endorsement to users submitting from a recognized institutional email address, so check whether your institutional address qualifies before assuming you need to chase down an endorser.

The step-by-step process

Start your submission and pick a category. Begin the normal arXiv submission process and select the subject category you want to submit to. arXiv will tell you at this point whether that category requires endorsement for your account.
Get your endorsement link. If endorsement is required, arXiv emails you a unique, shareable endorsement request link (sometimes referred to informally as an endorsement code). This link is what you send to a prospective endorser — it is how arXiv connects their endorsement action to your specific pending submission.
Find eligible endorsers. Search arXiv for recent papers in your subject category. On an abstract page, you can check “Which authors of this paper are endorsers?” to see if a co-author is eligible to endorse in that domain. Endorser contact information, where available, is also linked from the “Submission history” section of an abstract page.
Contact a prospective endorser directly. Send your endorsement link to someone you believe is eligible — ideally someone who actually knows your work, such as a thesis advisor, co-author, or colleague already publishing in that category, rather than a stranger picked at random from a paper’s author list. arXiv explicitly asks submitters not to mass-email multiple potential endorsers at once or to repeatedly contact the same person.
The endorser reviews and responds. Your endorser follows the link to an endorsement form and records a yes, no, or abstain response. arXiv is explicit that this is a topical-fit and basic-familiarity check, not peer review — the endorser is not vouching for whether your results are correct, only that the submission is appropriate for the category. Endorsers are expected to treat the content of an unpublished submission as confidential, and arXiv tells endorsers it is fine to decline if they are not comfortable endorsing.
Endorsement clears, submission proceeds. Once you have a positive endorsement for the category, your submission moves forward through arXiv’s normal moderation process — endorsement and moderation are separate checks (see above), so clearing endorsement is not a guarantee the paper will be accepted as submitted.

What makes someone eligible to endorse

An endorser must already be an established, active author within that same endorsement domain — arXiv counts papers the prospective endorser has authored in the domain, but only ones submitted between roughly three months and five years before the endorsement, so a very recent author cannot immediately turn around and endorse someone else, and older publication history eventually ages out. arXiv does not publish a single universal paper-count threshold; the exact number is calibrated per subject area, but arXiv’s own description of the intent is that any active researcher who has been working in a field for a few years should generally qualify. Because eligibility is domain-specific, someone with a long publication record in one category (say, condensed matter physics) cannot endorse a first-time submitter in an unrelated category (say, quantitative biology) — they would need their own standing in that specific domain.

If you have no eligible endorser

This is the most common dead end, and arXiv’s guidance is to go find one rather than treat the requirement as a wall: identify someone you know personally who is knowledgeable in your subject area and already active on arXiv there. For students, arXiv specifically suggests a thesis or research advisor. A co-author on the paper itself, if they already publish in that category, is another natural candidate. Submissions that require endorsement but do not yet have it are held, not rejected outright, which gives you a window to secure one rather than losing the submission.

Troubleshooting

You don’t recognize anyone eligible in the category. Search recent arXiv papers in the category rather than relying only on people you already know, and check the “Which authors of this paper are endorsers?” tool on abstract pages.
Your institutional email didn’t auto-qualify you. Automatic endorsement depends on arXiv recognizing your specific institutional domain; not every academic email address is on that list, and a personal or non-institutional address will not qualify.
An endorser you contacted seems unresponsive. Wait before escalating rather than mass-contacting others — arXiv asks submitters to avoid emailing many potential endorsers at once or repeatedly contacting the same person, so try a different, specific individual rather than broadcasting.
Your submission is on hold. A hold for missing endorsement is not a rejection; it resolves once a qualifying endorsement is recorded.
You’re not sure whether you actually need one. Start the submission process in the target category first — arXiv will only ask for endorsement if your account genuinely needs it for that specific domain.

Related terms

The endorsement system governs eligibility to submit to arXiv, which is the best-known example of a preprint server; see that entry for how preprints more generally relate to peer-reviewed publication.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can endorse someone on arXiv?

An endorser must already be an active, established arXiv author within the same endorsement domain — someone who has authored a sufficient number of papers in that domain within roughly the past five years, with at least a three-month gap since their own qualifying submission. They do not need a personal relationship with the person they endorse, but are expected to know the work well enough to judge that it is topically appropriate for the category.

How do you get an arXiv endorsement?

Start your submission and select a category; if endorsement is required, arXiv emails you a unique, shareable endorsement request link. Send that link to someone eligible to endorse in that specific domain — ideally someone who knows your work, such as a thesis advisor or co-author — and they record a yes, no, or abstain response through an endorsement form.

Do you need an endorsement for every arXiv submission?

No. Endorsement is required only the first time an author submits to a given endorsement domain. Once a paper has been accepted and announced in that domain, further submissions there do not require a new endorsement — though submitting to a different domain for the first time does.

What happens if your arXiv submission does not have an endorsement?

It is held rather than rejected. arXiv directs first-time submitters without a qualifying endorser to seek one out — such as a thesis advisor, co-author, or colleague already active in that subject area — during that window, rather than treating the requirement as a dead end.

Is arXiv endorsement the same as peer review?

No. Endorsement only checks that a submission is topically appropriate for its category and reflects basic familiarity with the field; it does not certify that the results are correct. It is also distinct from arXiv moderation, the ongoing, post-submission process in which category moderators can reclassify, hold, or — rarely — decline a paper.

Can you skip the arXiv endorsement process?

Sometimes. arXiv grants automatic endorsement to some authors submitting from a recognized institutional email domain, which bypasses the manual endorsement step. Otherwise, first-time submitters to a given category still need a qualifying endorser.