Direct comparison
arXiv vs. Research Square Compared
arXiv (free, nonprofit, physics/math/CS preprints) vs Research Square (Springer Nature-owned, journal-linked In Review): scope, ownership, screening compared.
Ask about arXiv vs. Research Square Compared
Answers are drawn from this comparison and the rest of the CASRAI corpus, with a link to every source.
Answers are AI-generated from CASRAI’s own published pages and can be wrong, so check the linked sources before relying on one; your question is logged without personal data — never sold, never used to train a third-party model — to show us what CASRAI is missing, so please do not type personal or confidential details. How we use this
How do arXiv, Research Square compare side by side?
The table below compares arXiv, Research Square across 10 procurement-relevant dimensions, from scope / discipline through typical audience.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | arXiv | Research Square |
|---|---|---|
| Scope / discipline | Physics, math, CS, quantitative biology/finance, statistics, EESS, economics only | Multidisciplinary (all fields) |
| Founded | 1991 (Los Alamos), moved to Cornell 2001 | Around 2013 |
| Operated / owned by | Independent nonprofit since July 1, 2026 (previously Cornell University) | Research Square Company, wholly owned by Springer Nature since Dec. 1, 2022 |
| Business model | Free to authors and readers; funded by institutional memberships and foundations | Free to post via In Review; commercial parent also sells paid author services (AJE) |
| Posting mechanism | Direct author upload, independent of any journal | Primarily automatic via In Review at journal submission |
| Journal integration | None required; optional transfer links to some partner journals | Deep -- 700+ Springer Nature/BMC journals; peer-review status shown on the page |
| Screening before posting | Subject-moderator check for topical fit, plagiarism, non-scientific content; first-time category submitters generally need endorsement | Editorial check for ethics/consent statements, competing interests, patient identifiers, pseudoscientific content |
| Peer review shown on record | No -- arXiv never carries peer-review reports | Optional -- journal reviewer reports may be published if the journal opts in |
| DOI assigned | Yes | Yes |
| Typical audience | Authors in arXiv's covered quantitative fields, regardless of eventual journal | Authors already submitting to a Research Square/In Review-participating journal, any field |
Common questions
Common questions about arXiv vs Research Square
Is Research Square owned by Springer Nature?
+
Yes. Springer Nature invested incrementally from 2016, became majority owner in 2020, and completed full acquisition of Research Square Company on December 1, 2022. arXiv has no publisher ownership and became an independent nonprofit on July 1, 2026.
Is a Research Square preprint peer reviewed?
+
No. Neither an arXiv nor a Research Square preprint is peer reviewed at the point it is posted. In Review tracks the manuscript's progress through the receiving journal's peer review and may show reviewer reports later if the journal opts in.
Can I post the same manuscript to both arXiv and Research Square?
+
There's no inherent conflict since they serve different purposes, but check each platform's and your target journal's duplicate-posting policy first -- most fields expect one canonical preprint DOI.
Does Research Square require endorsement like arXiv does?
+
No. arXiv's endorsement system applies only to first-time submitters in a subject category. Research Square has no equivalent -- its editorial screening covers ethics disclosures and competing interests instead.
