Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Continuation decision

The sponsor's programmatic and administrative determination, made after reviewing a periodic or annual report, of whether an already-approved multi-year project may proceed into its next budget period as planned. The decision itself -- satisfactory, satisfactory with comments, or unsatisfactory -- is distinct from the continuation award, which is the funding-release mechanism that follows a satisfactory decision.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · free to try

Ask about Continuation decision

Ask your first 2 questions free below. Subscribers get 150 a day for $29 a month.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. It cites the sources behind every answer, labels web answers and says when it can't answer.

Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.

Works on this site and inside Claude, Cursor and the AI tools you already use.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    NIH programme staff review a year-2 RPPR, find progress consistent with the approved plan, and issue a satisfactory continuation decision that leads to a Type 5 continuation award.

  • Is an instance

    A Horizon Europe project's periodic review flags underdelivered work-package milestones and results in a satisfactory-with-comments decision requiring a revised work plan before the next reporting period.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A competing renewal application, which restarts full peer review for support beyond the current project period, is not a continuation decision -- it is a separate, competitive process.

Editorial commentary

A continuation decision is the review determination a sponsor makes after reading a project’s periodic or annual report: does the project continue into its next budget period as planned, continue with corrective action, or face funding restriction? It is the decision; the resulting mechanism that actually releases the next budget period’s funds is the separate continuation award — the decision comes first and the award follows from it.

How the decision is reached

For NIH awards, program staff conduct an administrative review of the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) — not a new scientific peer review — confirming the report is complete and progress is consistent with the approved plan; a satisfactory outcome leads directly to a Type 5 non-competing continuation award reflected in an updated Notice of Award. Horizon Europe issues continuation decisions through its periodic technical and financial review process on the Funding & Tenders Portal, tied to the project’s defined reporting periods rather than an annual cycle.

Possible outcomes

Most continuation decisions are routine and satisfactory. A “satisfactory with comments” outcome continues funding but flags specific concerns the recipient must address in the next reporting cycle. An “unsatisfactory” outcome can trigger a corrective action plan, partial or conditional funding for the next period, increased reporting frequency, or — rarely, and usually only after correction has already failed — termination or a remedy under suspension.

Not the same as a competing renewal

A continuation decision governs whether an already-funded project keeps moving forward inside its current, already-awarded project period. It is unrelated to a competing renewal application, which restarts the entire competitive and peer-review process for support beyond the current award’s project period once that period actually ends.

References

  • NIH Grants Policy Statement (non-competing continuation review); Horizon Europe periodic review process, Funding & Tenders Portal guidance.

Also known as

Continuation determination · Annual continuation decision

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Continuation decision"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/continuation-decision" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/continuation-decision",
  "name": "Continuation decision",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/continuation-decision",
  "description": "The sponsor's programmatic and administrative determination, made after reviewing a periodic or annual report, of whether an already-approved multi-year project may proceed into its next budget period as planned. The decision itself -- satisfactory, satisfactory with comments, or unsatisfactory -- is distinct from the continuation award, which is the funding-release mechanism that follows a satisfactory decision.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/funding-finance#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/continuation-decision",
  "alternateName": [
    "Continuation determination",
    "Annual continuation decision"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:23:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T19:42:48",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Ask CASRAI · Regulatory Radar

Research-admin question? Get an answer that links its sources.

An AI assistant specialized in research administration. Every answer links its sources to check before you act. 2 questions free, no account. $29/month after.

  • Answers draw on CASRAI's guides and dictionary plus the federal and funder documents we index: Federal Register, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov and UKRI.
  • Every answer numbers its sources and links each one, so you can check the source yourself.