Skip to main content
v2026.11,610 entries · CC-BY 4.0
LAC HealthLaboratory & ResearchLab & research supplies.Reagents, consumables, PPE & instruments — documented, fast, chain-of-custody shipping.Shop lac.us lac.us
Dictionary termTrack Proposedv2026.1

New England Journal of Medicine’s Journal Impact Factor (JIF)

The New England Journal of Medicine's Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is the Clarivate-computed, journal-level citation ratio the Massachusetts Medical Society's flagship clinical-medicine journal receives each year in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) -- citations in the JCR data year to the journal's citable items from the two preceding years, divided by that item count. NEJM (ISSN 0028-4793 print, 1533-4406 online) has published continuously since 1812, making it one of the oldest continuously published medical journals in the world, and is indexed in Clarivate's Science Citation Index Expanded, which makes it JIF-eligible. Third-party JCR-tracking aggregators report NEJM's 2-year JIF in the high-70s to mid-80s range for recent releases -- figures cited include roughly 78.5 and roughly 84.5 for figures described as the '2025 impact factor,' attributed inconsistently to the 2025 versus 2026 JCR release across different aggregator pages -- with a reported 5-year JIF near 84.9. These aggregator figures do not agree with one another even when describing what appears to be the same release, and NEJM's own journal-information page was not independently reachable to confirm one authoritative figure at the time of writing (returned an access-restricted response during verification). Treat any single number you see cited as time-stamped to a specific JCR release -- Clarivate updates JCR every June -- and check jcr.clarivate.com or nejm.org directly for the current, release-dated figure before citing it in a formal context such as a CV, grant application, or tenure file. Per DORA (San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment) and CoARA guidance, this journal-level figure should not be used as a proxy for the quality of any individual article NEJM has published, nor of the researchers who authored it.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Jul 2026

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A researcher checking NEJM's current JCR entry against JAMA's or The Lancet's separately computed JIF before comparing the relative citation impact of the general-medicine journals they are considering for a manuscript, while treating the comparison as journal-level only.

  • Is an instance

    A grants office noting in an internal metrics reference that NEJM is Science Citation Index Expanded-indexed and therefore receives an annual JIF from Clarivate, distinct from journal ranking tools like Scopus's CiteScore, which uses a different citation window and denominator.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Citing a single NEJM impact-factor figure pulled from an aggregator site as if it were the authoritative, current number without noting the JCR release year it reflects -- aggregator figures for NEJM diverge from one another and change with each annual JCR update.

  • Not an instance

    Using NEJM's high JIF to argue that a specific article published in NEJM is more rigorous or more important than a comparable article published in a lower-JIF journal -- the JIF is a journal-level average, not an article-level or author-level quality measure, per DORA.

Editorial commentary

The New England Journal of Medicine’s Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a specific, illustrative instance of the general Journal Impact Factor metric published annually by Clarivate in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). NEJM is owned and published by the Massachusetts Medical Society and has appeared continuously since 1812, making its publication history one of the longest of any medical journal still in circulation.

What the number actually measures

The JIF is a ratio: citations received in a given JCR data year to a journal’s citable items (articles and reviews) published in the two preceding years, divided by the number of those citable items. NEJM (ISSN 0028-4793 print, 1533-4406 online) is indexed in Clarivate’s Science Citation Index Expanded and receives its own JIF on that basis, computed the same mechanical way as every other JCR-indexed title, regardless of the journal’s age, prestige, or article volume.

A note on the current figure

Third-party JCR-tracking aggregators report NEJM’s 2-year JIF in the high-70s to mid-80s range for recent releases — figures seen include roughly 78.5 and roughly 84.5, both described by different aggregator pages as the ‘current’ or ‘2025’ impact factor, with the two figures attributed inconsistently to the 2025 versus 2026 JCR release. A reported 5-year JIF near 84.9 also appears across trackers. These aggregator figures do not fully agree with one another, which is typical when different JCR releases or caching lags are being reflected, and NEJM’s own journal-information page returned an access-restricted response during verification, so it was not independently confirmed against a single primary source at the time of writing. Treat any single number you see cited as time-stamped to a specific JCR release — Clarivate updates JCR every June — and check jcr.clarivate.com or nejm.org directly for the current, release-dated figure before citing it in a formal context such as a CV, grant application, or tenure file.

Worked example

If NEJM published 350 citable items across two preceding years, and those items collectively received 28,000 citations in the JCR data year, the resulting JIF would be 28,000 / 350 = 80.0 — the same arithmetic Clarivate applies to every JCR-indexed journal, from a small society title to a long-running general-medicine flagship like this one. What differs is the citation and publication volume feeding the ratio, not the formula itself. NEJM’s comparatively low annual output of citable items relative to its very high citation counts is part of why its JIF sits far above most other journals, including other high-profile general-medicine titles.

Why the figure runs so high, and what it doesn’t tell you

NEJM’s JIF is consistently among the highest of any journal indexed by Clarivate, general-medicine or otherwise. A high JIF reflects that NEJM’s published articles are, on average, cited frequently within the two-year citation window — it does not mean every individual article is highly cited, nor that articles published in NEJM are inherently more rigorous than articles published elsewhere. Per DORA (San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment) and CoARA’s responsible-assessment guidance, journal-level metrics like the JIF should not be used as a substitute for evaluating the actual content of a specific paper, or the contributions of a specific researcher, in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.

Related terms

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="New England Journal of Medicine’s Journal Impact Factor (JIF)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/new-england-journal-of-medicine-impact-factor" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/new-england-journal-of-medicine-impact-factor",
  "name": "New England Journal of Medicine's Journal Impact Factor (JIF)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/new-england-journal-of-medicine-impact-factor",
  "description": "The New England Journal of Medicine's Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is the Clarivate-computed, journal-level citation ratio the Massachusetts Medical Society's flagship clinical-medicine journal receives each year in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) -- citations in the JCR data year to the journal's citable items from the two preceding years, divided by that item count. NEJM (ISSN 0028-4793 print, 1533-4406 online) has published continuously since 1812, making it one of the oldest continuously published medical journals in the world, and is indexed in Clarivate's Science Citation Index Expanded, which makes it JIF-eligible. Third-party JCR-tracking aggregators report NEJM's 2-year JIF in the high-70s to mid-80s range for recent releases -- figures cited include roughly 78.5 and roughly 84.5 for figures described as the '2025 impact factor,' attributed inconsistently to the 2025 versus 2026 JCR release across different aggregator pages -- with a reported 5-year JIF near 84.9. These aggregator figures do not agree with one another even when describing what appears to be the same release, and NEJM's own journal-information page was not independently reachable to confirm one authoritative figure at the time of writing (returned an access-restricted response during verification). Treat any single number you see cited as time-stamped to a specific JCR release -- Clarivate updates JCR every June -- and check jcr.clarivate.com or nejm.org directly for the current, release-dated figure before citing it in a formal context such as a CV, grant application, or tenure file. Per DORA (San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment) and CoARA guidance, this journal-level figure should not be used as a proxy for the quality of any individual article NEJM has published, nor of the researchers who authored it.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/publishing#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/new-england-journal-of-medicine-impact-factor",
  "sameAs": [],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "dateModified": "2026-07-23T05:33:44",
  "inLanguage": "en"
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →