Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EStablev2026.2

Quantitative-qualitative balance

The principle in responsible assessment that quantitative indicators should support, not supplant, qualitative expert judgement and that both forms of evidence should be combined transparently.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 21 May 2026

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A funder uses bibliometric portfolio analysis to inform strategy but assesses individual applications by peer review.

  • Is an instance

    A panel publishes its rubric explaining how qualitative judgement integrates supplementary indicators.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Resolving disagreement between peer reviewers by ranking on h-index.

  • Not an instance

    Reporting a single composite score that hides the qualitative weighting.

Editorial commentary

Responsible-assessment frameworks (DORA, Leiden Manifesto, Metric Tide, CoARA) converge on the position that no quantitative indicator can replace expert peer review for evaluating the quality of individual research or researchers, but indicators can usefully inform context and pattern-spotting at larger scales (e.g., portfolio analysis). Achieving an appropriate balance means: (1) being explicit about which questions are answered quantitatively versus qualitatively; (2) reporting numbers with uncertainty and context; (3) giving final weight to qualitative judgement in decisions about individuals; and (4) auditing the balance regularly.

References

  • Hicks et al., Nature, 2015. Wilsdon et al., HEFCE, 2015. CoARA Agreement, 2022.

Also known as

Mixed-methods assessment · Balanced assessment

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Quantitative-qualitative balance"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/quantitative-qualitative-balance" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "name": "Quantitative-qualitative balance",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/quantitative-qualitative-balance",
  "description": "The principle in responsible assessment that quantitative indicators should support, not supplant, qualitative expert judgement and that both forms of evidence should be combined transparently.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/responsible-research-assessment/",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/quantitative-qualitative-balance",
  "sameAs": [
    "Mixed-methods assessment",
    "Balanced assessment"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →