Skip to main content
v2026.1714 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EStablev2026.2

Responsible metrics

An approach to using quantitative indicators in research assessment that emphasises robustness, humility, transparency, diversity and reflexivity, as articulated in the 2015 Metric Tide report.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 21 May 2026

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    An institution publishes an annual statement on its use of metrics, accompanied by the five principles.

  • Is an instance

    A research office co-publishes its bibliometric data sources and processes openly.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Using metric products whose methodologies are proprietary and undisclosed in promotion decisions.

  • Not an instance

    Comparing departments by single indicators without disciplinary normalisation or qualitative review.

Editorial commentary

The term 'responsible metrics' was coined by the Metric Tide review (Wilsdon et al., 2015) and operationalised through the Forum for Responsible Research Metrics in the UK. The five principles are: robustness (use the best possible data in terms of accuracy and scope); humility (recognise that quantitative evaluation should support, not supplant, qualitative expert assessment); transparency (keep data collection and analytical processes open and simple); diversity (account for variation by field and use a range of indicators); reflexivity (recognise and anticipate the systemic and potential effects of indicators and update them in response). The framework is now embedded in CoARA, the R4RI, and many institutional and funder policies.

References

  • Wilsdon et al. 'The Metric Tide', HEFCE, 2015. Forum for Responsible Research Metrics (frrm.ac.uk).

Also known as

Responsible use of metrics · Responsible research metrics

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Responsible metrics"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/responsible-metrics" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "name": "Responsible metrics",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/responsible-metrics",
  "description": "An approach to using quantitative indicators in research assessment that emphasises robustness, humility, transparency, diversity and reflexivity, as articulated in the 2015 Metric Tide report.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/responsible-research-assessment/",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/responsible-metrics",
  "sameAs": [
    "Responsible use of metrics",
    "Responsible research metrics"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}

Adopted by research universities worldwide

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoMassachusetts Institute of Technology logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo

View CASRAI adoption →