Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Academic publishing is the system through which researchers’ findings are submitted to journals, books or preprint servers, evaluated by editors and peer reviewers, issued as a citable version with a persistent identifier, and then indexed and corrected over time. This guide maps who does what in that system, where the ethics duties sit in the process, and how the main routes to publication differ, so an author or research office can see the whole pipeline rather than a single step.
What academic publishing is
Academic (scholarly) publishing is the formal communication of research. Its core product is the academic journal article, though books, conference papers and preprints sit alongside it. Three functions recur across all of them: certification (editors and peer reviewers judge the work), dissemination (the work is made available, openly or behind a subscription) and preservation and discovery (the work gets a persistent identifier, is indexed and can be corrected or retracted if needed).
What is the academic publishing industry?
The industry is the set of organisations that perform those functions: commercial publishers, learned societies, university presses and non-profit open-access publishers, plus supporting infrastructure such as registries and indexes. Scale figures differ between sources and change every year, so this page quotes sizes only for infrastructure bodies that publish their own numbers, attributed to them.
Who does what in academic publishing
| Actor | Role | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Editors | Decide which manuscripts are accepted; process manuscripts in a timely manner; recuse themselves from decisions where they have conflicts. | ICMJE Recommendations, section II.C |
| Peer reviewers | Assess the manuscript and must keep it strictly confidential. | ICMJE Recommendations, section II.C |
| Registries | Crossref describes itself as the world’s largest registry of DOIs and metadata for the scholarly research community, with more than 26,500 member organisations and over 185 million records retrievable without restriction (figures as shown on its community page, read 8 November 2026). | Crossref |
| Open-access indexes | DOAJ describes itself as an extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, run by the DOAJ Foundation, a non-profit Danish foundation, to increase the reach and credibility of peer-reviewed open access research. | DOAJ |
Authors write and submit the work; publishers and societies run journal and book programmes and issue the published version.
The academic publishing process step by step
The sequence below is the common pattern; each journal publishes its own instructions and timelines, which take precedence.
- Choose a venue and prepare the manuscript. Match the journal’s scope and follow its author instructions. See journal indexing for what being indexed does and does not signal.
- Submit. Authors upload the manuscript through the journal’s submission system, with any declarations the journal requires, such as conflicts of interest.
- Editorial screening. An editor decides whether the manuscript fits the journal and goes to external review.
- Peer review. Reviewers evaluate the work in confidence; the model (single-anonymized, double-anonymized or open) is set by the journal, as compared in single-blind vs double-blind vs open peer review.
- Decision and revision. The editor accepts, asks for revision or rejects; authors respond to the reviewers point by point.
- Production and publication. The accepted manuscript is typeset and issued as the version of record, normally with a DOI. The stages of a manuscript’s life are set out in preprint vs postprint vs version of record.
- Discovery and correction. The article is indexed, and later corrections or retractions are attached to its record.
Where the ethics duties sit
The ICMJE Recommendations (section II.C, responsibilities in the submission and peer-review process) set duties at the review stages: reviewers must keep manuscripts strictly confidential; editors should not publicize reviewer comments without the permission of the reviewer and the author; editors should process manuscripts in a timely manner; and editors with conflicts of interest should recuse themselves from decisions. The recommendations also address the use of AI by reviewers and editors in section V. The ICMJE applies directly to the journals that follow it; other journals set their own policies.
How published work is indexed and kept correct
Once published, an article is registered and findable through several layers. Crossref’s community page describes its metadata as retrievable without restriction, says its Crossmark service attaches updates, corrections and retractions to a record, and lists a similarity checking service. DOAJ separately indexes open access journals under its inclusion criteria. For how the layers differ, see Crossref: DOIs, metadata and how publishers use it, and for what corrections and retractions each mean, retractions, errata, corrigenda and expressions of concern.
Strengths and limits of the system
- Strength: independent scrutiny. External review and editorial decisions create a record of how a claim was checked, with confidentiality and conflict rules at each stage.
- Strength: a durable record. Persistent identifiers and registry metadata keep citations resolving, and correction notices let readers see later changes.
- Limit: timeliness depends on the journal. ICMJE asks editors to be timely but sets no deadline; actual timelines vary (see how long does peer review take).
- Limit: cost and access depend on the route. Whether a reader pays, or an author or funder pays an article processing charge, depends on the model chosen.
- Limit: review is not a guarantee. Peer review is a judgment process; corrections and retractions exist because published work can still be found wrong.
Routes to publication compared
| Route | How the article reaches readers | Where to read more |
|---|---|---|
| Subscription journal | Readers or their libraries pay for access to the journal. | Academic journal |
| Gold open access journal | The final article is open on the publisher’s site. | Gold open access |
| Hybrid journal | A subscription journal in which individual articles can be made open. | Hybrid open access journals |
| Preprint plus journal | The manuscript is posted to a server; the journal later issues the version of record. | Preprint servers explained |
For the full range of open models, see open access publishing and gold vs green vs diamond vs hybrid.
FAQ
What is the academic publishing process?
Submission, editorial screening, peer review, decision and revision, production, then indexing and later correction if required. Each journal sets its own instructions and timelines.
What are examples of academic publishing?
Peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books and book chapters, conference papers and preprints posted to servers.
Who runs academic publishing?
Publishers, societies and university presses run journals and books; editors and reviewers, usually researchers, perform the evaluation; registries such as Crossref and indexes such as DOAJ provide shared infrastructure.
Are academic publishing companies the same as journals?
No. A journal is a titled publication with an editorial board; a publisher is the organisation that produces one or many journals. Judge a specific journal by its own policy pages and the indexers’ own lists, not by the publisher name alone.
Where can I find academic publishing articles and journals?
Use library databases and indexes; see journal indexing. Free PDFs are appropriate where the article is open access or the author has deposited an allowed version.
Sources
- ICMJE, Recommendations, section II.C (Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process) and section V: icmje.org/recommendations, read 8 November 2026.
- Crossref, Community: crossref.org/community, read 8 November 2026; figures change.
- DOAJ, About: doaj.org/about, read 8 November 2026.
