Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
Using Elicit to identify candidate papers, then verifying each in PubMed before inclusion
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A traditional PubMed boolean search with no AI ranking is not AI in literature search
Editorial commentary
Disclosure should specify the tool, version, search date, query strategy, and how AI suggestions were verified against original sources. AI literature tools may miss papers their training/index does not include, and may hallucinate citations — both verifiable against PubMed, Crossref, or similar canonical sources.
References
- Khraisha et al. 2023 ‘Can LLMs Replace Humans in Systematic Reviews?’ Research Synthesis Methods
- Cochrane Position on Generative AI in Evidence Synthesis (2024)
Also known as
AI-powered literature search · LLM literature review
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="AI in literature search"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-in-literature-search" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"name": "AI in literature search",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-in-literature-search",
"description": "The use of AI-powered tools (Elicit, Consensus, Scite, Undermind, Semantic Scholar's AI features) to discover, screen, summarise, or synthesise scholarly literature, distinguished from traditional keyword search by the use of embeddings, LLM summarisation, or generative answering over a literature corpus.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/generative-ai-use-and-disclosure/",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/ai-in-literature-search",
"sameAs": [
"AI-powered literature search",
"LLM literature review"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}







