Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A clinical trial paper that follows CONSORT 2010 with full protocol deposit on a registry.
- Is an instance
An animal-study paper following ARRIVE 2.0 with complete husbandry and randomisation details.
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A bit-identical re-run of code (computational, not methods).
- Not an instance
A new study on a new sample (replicability).
Editorial commentary
Methods reproducibility is the bar set by reporting standards (CONSORT, ARRIVE, PRISMA, STROBE). It is a property of the published record itself: a study can have perfect methods reproducibility yet fail computational or empirical reproducibility, and vice versa.
References
- Goodman, Fanelli, Ioannidis (Science Translational Medicine, 2016).
Also known as
transparent reporting · reporting reproducibility
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
xml
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Methods reproducibility"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/methods-reproducibility" />json
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"name": "Methods reproducibility",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/methods-reproducibility",
"description": "The degree to which a study's methods are reported in sufficient detail that another investigator could re-implement them, independent of whether the same numerical or empirical results would follow.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/reproducibility-and-computational-research/",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/methods-reproducibility",
"sameAs": [
"transparent reporting",
"reporting reproducibility"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
}
